Claim: An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
According to the claim made , the fact should be alkways mistruted given the examples of some of them were proven to be false in the past. I tend to disagree with this claim. There might be some facts that were proven to be false , indeed. But, we also have many facts that are later proven to be true, for examples, measuremet of sum of the internal angles of trangloes is always condtant, flow direction of water etc.
There are numerous fundamental activities that were assumed to be fact since several years and later justified to be true. Lets go with simples one. People since a long period of time assumed if anythings falls, it will fall down not up. They took this phenomenon as a fact. Later Newton found that this is beacuse of arcane phenomenon of gravity but is still true. Additionally, our anchestors were inure to make water canals and other hydrauylic system since a long based upon the fact that water always falls from high to low terrain. This is later proved as the result of gravitational pull of earth but it is true too. Thus, making claim based upon some exception is not a sign of aquity.
Facts are those speculations that are assumed to be true without justifacation. Those are helping human kinds for a along. For example, when we are working on geometry, we always assume sum of internal angle to be constany: 180 degree. This is always been a fact and been used for a along time. This is proven later. Additionally, the relation between different sides of a right angled triangle by Archimedease is also fact. No matter what condition arises, the relation between the sides of the trianglle is same.
In some cases, hoewever there are some facts that are later proved to be false. For example, human civilizatiobn used to assumed that Sun and other planet revolves earth and Aristotle authorized this as a fact. But later Gallilio proved that fact as a mistake of human kind. Additionally, people were beleving in some cult and tabooed many activity which are later, with the help of science and technology proved to be false. In many culture, Sun and Moon were assumed to be god, not planet. But discovery oif human kind beyond Earth proved that as a false. that is why, we have to think critically about any fact.
In the final analysis, i disgaree with the 'Sweeping claim' that all facts are to be taken mistruted. There are plenty of examples that we faced, can help to stand aganist this claim. Some of them also strengthens above claim indeed. So, people have to be wise enough to specualte each and every fact but not to mistook them as mistrusted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gauravwazza12 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Kutumba kasyap | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | macropinna | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Roshan Dhakal | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | AAAA2222 | 83 | view |
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorateDiscuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 35
- "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they entercollege rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academiccourses to offer." 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justifythose decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
According to the claim made , the fact should be alkways mistruted gi...
^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... some facts that were proven to be false , indeed. But, we also have many facts th...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...l years and later justified to be true. Lets go with simples one. People since a lon...
^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...o with simples one. People since a long period of time assumed if anythings falls, it will fal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inured'.
Suggestion: inured
...true. Additionally, our anchestors were inure to make water canals and other hydrauyl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tion. Those are helping human kinds for a along. For example, when we are working...
^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...tion. Those are helping human kinds for a along. For example, when we are working on ge...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is always been a fact and been used for a along time. This is proven later. Addit...
^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: ALONG_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a long time'?
Suggestion: a long time
... always been a fact and been used for a along time. This is proven later. Additionally, th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun activity seems to be countable; consider using: 'many activities'.
Suggestion: many activities
... were beleving in some cult and tabooed many activity which are later, with the help of scien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun culture seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cultures'.
Suggestion: many cultures
...e and technology proved to be false. In many culture, Sun and Moon were assumed to be god, n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 550, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
... human kind beyond Earth proved that as a false. that is why, we have to think critical...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 559, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...nd beyond Earth proved that as a false. that is why, we have to think critically abo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, thus, for example, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 44.0 19.5258426966 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65577342048 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45150785992 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472766884532 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9582559958 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2333333333 118.986275619 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.3 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25413467339 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746778793449 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778222119596 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165950710284 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611991327628 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 14.1392134831 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.