Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Any type of work should be judged by the expert in that field. Any type of research papers should be scrutinized by the expert in the field of particular paper. But there are many cases in which the above statement does not hold true.
Take for example movies which hit the theaters are judged or scrutinized by film critics,directors and producers associated in that industry. But people generally have less in their judgement as sometimes the judgement tends to be biased.So, people like us takes the help Of websites like google or rotable tomatoes to see what general people has said about those movies. They have more faith in the judgement of those people who has given rating or writing comments about those movies in those websites. Expert" people like "us" would still have more faith in them than the actual experts in that field. after we as people will then decide whether to watch that movie or not.
The person has that tendency to judge that restaurant based on what is given online rather than what the actual food "experts" are saying. One such reason maybe is that the food which may be Liked by those food critics may or may not be liked by common people like us. So we as people will make the decision after we consult with our friends or from those people who have actually visited that restaurant.
But whenever it comes in to the academic background the actual statement given holds true. Suppose when any student is opting to pursue PhD program in any university he or she has to present the topic of dissertation to their respective branch of that university. So, in Order to judge the quality of topic the university will then select some researchers who has same area of interest or has previously worked or currently working with that topic. If for example any student wants to pursue his PhD in Fluid mechanics the university will select some group Of researchers who are involved in the field of fluid mechanics to give their judgement about that topic. They will not select any biological researchers to rate his topic. Since that researcher may not have that much idea about that particular topic.
Only three examples have been considered here out of possible millions. If we look at a behaviour sense then judgement made by the "real experts" should be given more importance. But sometimes judgement from the not so called experts should be considered as it may have Some positive result which may lead to some important findings
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , directors
...re judged or scrutinized by film critics,directors and producers associated in that indust...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...etimes the judgement tends to be biased.So, people like us takes the help Of websi...
^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... than the actual experts in that field. after we as people will then decide whether t...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 141, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (PhD) must be used with a third-person verb: 'programs'.
Suggestion: programs
...hen any student is opting to pursue PhD program in any university he or she has to pres...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct some researchers who has same area of interest or has previously worked or cur...
^^^
Line 6, column 452, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d or currently working with that topic. If for example any student wants to pursue...
^^
Line 6, column 733, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ological researchers to rate his topic. Since that researcher may not have that much ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, look, may, so, still, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8761682243 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67058732131 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474299065421 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5473737704 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.35 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170436461466 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590455879309 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638829772831 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104090604801 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054951415562 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.