Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
truly valuable work can be judged by anyone, critical judgement also can be proposed by anyone. In addition, not only expert, but amateurs can promulgate constructive advice. I argue that every critical judgement of work has equal value no matter where it comes from.
First, there are many different kinds of works in world, such as artistic work, literature writing, political amendment or even the students' homework. every work has purpose, the evaluation is also operated in peculiar ways. However, critical judgement plays an essential role for the progress of developing the work. we can not deny the professional properties of experts' opinion, and they can induce a positive effect, but the judgement from normal people can also be constructive, for example, when it comes to political emendation, demotic proposal could be decisive, whereas can truly represent plebeian viewpoints and their wish for the future change in the nation. At this time, if the nation only adopts experts' judgement, it could result despotism.
Second, even if we cede to only adopt critical judgements from experts', there is a chance that the judgement claimed to be helpful, but it is futile or even wrong. Not all experts hold the truths, they can also make mistakes. Nowadays, there are many feigned cases disclosed by media, some of the professional scholars are indicted to commit academic fraud. Hence, we can not believe every judgement from experts. Though there are some fields that need trained experts, normal people can also share their ideas. also, a critical judgement not only need professional knowledge to support, creativity is also vital for a suggestion. creativity can provide a prominent evolution for a work, especially in artistic field or even in technological innovation. In some cases, those unexpected judgement are conceived by normal people instead of experts.
Conversely, someone may dispute my position, they assert that only critical judgement from experts can make contribution, regardless of how conspicuous the judgement that comes from layperson. I maintain this amiss argument has many flaws, they hold a narrow point of view, only focusing on the professional complexity. One thing needs to be clarified is that the work is not only served for partial people, a great work need to be criticized by everyone and severed for anyone regardless of their career, age, gender or education level. it should be effective in any circumstances. To achieve this objective, we could not ignore the judgement from normal people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 66
- The following appeared on the Mozart School of Music Web site."The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons. First of all, the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at all ability and age 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
truly valuable work can be judged by any...
^^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Truly
truly valuable work can be judged by anyone, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...value no matter where it comes from. First, there are many different kinds of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... it comes from. First, there are many different kinds of works in world, such as artist...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...riting, political amendment or even the students homework. every work has purpose, the e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Every
...mendment or even the students homework. every work has purpose, the evaluation is als...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...or the progress of developing the work. we can not deny the professional propertie...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udgement, it could result despotism. Second, even if we cede to only adopt cr...
^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... many feigned cases disclosed by media, some of the professional scholars are indicted to c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...rmal people can also share their ideas. also, a critical judgement not only need pro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Creativity
...ativity is also vital for a suggestion. creativity can provide a prominent evolution for a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by normal people instead of experts. Conversely, someone may dispute my posit...
^^^
Line 7, column 542, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...career, age, gender or education level. it should be effective in any circumstance...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, whereas, for example, in addition, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2881773399 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79772707898 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529556650246 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.4647132088 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.238095238 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122836682396 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449345056452 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350002499691 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089339101073 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00891139991934 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.