Disagreement leads to stress and reduces learning
The statement asserts that lack of agreement results in stress and halts the process of learning. I partially agree with this claim and believe disagreement leads to learn effectively, although it induces some sort of stress in certain conditions.
To begin with, lack of common opinion leads to stress in some conditions. when some group of heterogenous people are given a project to handle, they may differ in opinion and this may raise conflicts among themselves which eventually leads to development of stress among them. Additionally, in the case of students when their close friends do not agree with them, they may feel disinterested in regular activities and may lose the interest in studies and this will effect them finally.
However, disagreement always does not lead to induction of stress. For example, when a group of people have dissimilar opinions on a common topic, it might be sorted out by proper discussion between the all the members. All the members in the group can sit at a place and discuss on how to overcome the mistakes and illustrate properly on the logic that leads to disagreement. As a result, no person will have any tension on what the output is going to be. According to a survey by psychologists, when there is contradiction in the opinions, people tend to learn from their mistakes by following their fellow beings.
To summarise, I consider that if there is no agreement on a common topic between members of a group, it does not always lead to stress. Moreover, disagreement leads to enhancement in the learning process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
| 2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
- Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries.what are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on the society? 56
- heating fuel choice according to year of construction 53
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities.to what extend do you agree 56
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e sort of stress in certain conditions. To begin with, lack of common opinion le...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ion leads to stress in some conditions. when some group of heterogenous people are ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ditions. when some group of heterogenous people are given a project to handle, th...
^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...e the interest in studies and this will effect them finally. However, disagreeme...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, sort of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 263.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98479087452 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86725295846 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54752851711 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8707905263 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302090693534 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137092722569 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13051388946 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22553455033 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985656086699 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.