Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
This topic raises the issue of whether discussing a controversial issue with someone with contrasting mindset is usefull. The pivotal point here is scope of "usefull". Indisputably, there is no point of arguing unless it is followed by analysis and action. Nevertheless, this discussion will be valuable because it will contain root causes for the controversies in the first place. Thus, I believe that discussing controversial topics with the opposing side is usefull.
First of all, by arguing with those having contradicting view we are exposed to their view points. I would like to point out that learning diverse reasons of opposite belief will help you to understand the causes of these differences. To illustrate, let us take example of very common vegeterians vs non-vegetarians - for all you alure vegetarians about the variety and taste of non-veg they won't even taste your chicken. But only when we discuss this with them we will come to know about their religion and the reason for their beliefs, which is - that human's design of digestive system is similar to herbivores. In this circumstance, obviously some new piece of information will add upto your knowledge and knowledge is never a waste. Consequently, a healthy discussion opens new ways of thinking for us.
Furthermore, if we don't embrace the opinion which is in contrast to that of ours, we'll never know - due to lack of facts - that is it us who needs to change their beliefs or its them. Specifically, if we just dodge a conversation on a sensative topic with an adament person of contrasting view, we are losing an opportunity to know the idealogy of not only that person but the community of people who thinks that way. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that this knowledge is very usefull for us to adopt in a diversified society with people from different parts of the world and with different belief. It is this practicle knowledge that is usefull for us in order to become a better member of society. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrate that we should never avoid discussing controversial topics with people with contrasting opinions.
Admittedly, sometimes its not possible to change the minds of people we are talking to. By only discussing we are not able to change a single thing in this world, but for making a change, discussing and analyzing the depth of any controversial issue is the first step towards the betterment of the society. Therefore, merely discussing is not usefull untill we want to do something about it, that is, it is usefull only when we want to learn the difference and take actions based on it.
In conclusion, although discussing controversies have proved to be no good to any individual, it is important to discuss them in order to learn about their causes and beliefs behind them, which inturn is usefull for us to embrace the diverse yet unified society. As long as some area are involved these controversial debates are usefull in brainstorming the ideas that would benefit the society. In fact, solutions to some of the world's biggest problems lie just a discussion away.
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 58
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... thinking for us. Furthermore, if we dont embrace the opinion which is in contras...
^^^^
Line 9, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mbrace the diverse yet unified society. As long as some area are involved these co...
^^
Line 9, column 419, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...efit the society. In fact, solutions to some of the worlds biggest problems lie just a disc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 431, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the biggest'.
Suggestion: worlds the biggest
...iety. In fact, solutions to some of the worlds biggest problems lie just a discussion away.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, first of all, in contrast to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96571428571 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95219879373 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 820.8 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3242531029 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8636363636 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331782424238 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959351073334 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818859518476 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181395867955 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536597078935 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.