Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
This topic discusses the question that those who thoroughly believe in their ideas tend to leave a lasting legacy. Indisputably, great ideas are appreciated by everybody. Nevertheless, groundbreaking ideas are considered quixotic in the beginning and is mocked upon. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion that idea which gathers a lot of criticism is not legendary and would argue that those who believe in their ideas irrespective of criticism are the ones who are going to leave a lasting legacy.
First of all, faith in oneself is the first and foremost thing one needs to have in order to make history. I would like to point out that history is proof of the fact that almost all of the revolutionary inventions were mocked upon and criticized by society. To illustrate, let us look at some of the examples - Thomas Alva Edison failed at least a thousand times before inventing the electric bulb. Wright Brothers were mocked upon when they were trying to make humans fly. In both of these circumstances, obviously, they were thorough with their ideas, and regardless of the criticism, they followed their idea. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that those who believed in themselves are the ones who created a lasting legacy.
Admittedly, those who blindly follow their ideas irrespective of the world advising against that are sometimes the ones who are tagged as mentally challenged by society. This is especially true when there has been nothing but failures and the person has given up on himself but he/she doesn't want to admit it. However, the argument above fails to constitute sufficient support to claim that if society criticizes the idea, it cannot establish a legacy. Because every out of the box thinking seems absurd and impractical to society at first, if someone is thorough in their idea, they are gonna create a legacy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-06 | rahatumar9072 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ruhani | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | the.umair__ | 75 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | keisham | 70 | view |
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 66
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 58
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ic in the beginning and is mocked upon. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...istory is proof of the fact that almost all of the revolutionary inventions were mocked up...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... society. To illustrate, let us look at some of the examples - Thomas Alva Edison failed at...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rson has given up on himself but he/she doesnt want to admit it. However, the argument...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, at least, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01298701299 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74406559693 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5527883448 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333064465868 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113215751683 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123052418564 0.0758088955206 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241425732872 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101173032954 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.