Due to physical differences, men and women are suited for different physical tasks.
A quick look around in any high school classroom is sufficient to note that men and women are built different. The biological difference manifests itself in many forms: males have a lower pitch, are taller, weigh more, and have a higher muscle-to-mass ratio. It is also a tautological to say that tasks other than those that require pure brain exercise, can be be accomplished relatively easier if one has a specific body type suited to that task. In light of these almost obvious truths, it should come as no surprise that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks, owing to their inherent physical differences.
There are a number of physically taxing jobs like brick-laying or warehouse operations that are still done by humans today. They require a considerable amount of muscle power. Naturally, when considering candidatures for such positions, an average man is more likely to have the required brawn than the average woman. If the average woman were to take on a task such as brick-laying, she would tire more easily and faster than if a man were doing it. The employer would thus find more number of men populating such positions than women. It is then obvious that men are more suited to hefty work that employs a significant amount of huffing and puffing.
Women, on average, have lower testosterone levels than men. Testosterone predisposes an individual to aggression and conniptions. There are a number of jobs in the world that require high amounts of aggression. Bars across the world see a numbe of drunk people with lowered inhibitions, more than willing to start fights. It is in the interest of bar owners to ensure that drunken fighting and other unsavoury behaviour get shut down very quickly. A very good way of doing that is employing an imposing, no-nonsense, aggressive person to keep the tricky customers in check. Due to their higher muscle-to-mass ratio and a greater amount of testosteron coursing through their bodies, men naturally make for better bouncers than women. This is yet another case of physical differences making one gender better suited to a particular job.
In the business of primary schooling, it is important to have a safe and nurturing environment for the kids. A burly, brash person would terrify most kids. What is thus needed is someone who can be patient and gentle with the students so as to put them at ease and make an environment conducive for learning and development. A majority of primary school teachers happen to be women. This is because women generally have a smaller frame, softer voices and usually have the nursing instinct. They are also marked by lower aggression levels. This makes them a better fit for the role of a primary school teacher than men, who are usually the exact opposite.
An important thing to keep in mind, however, than when talking about better suitedness for a job, we are referring only to a trend. It is in no way a rule to be applied broadly everywhere. With the advent of technology, machines are taking over a numbe of jobs that require heavy manual labour. This makes the playing field somewhat more level, as women now become comparable to men in accomplishing tasks that require less physical exertion. There are also always outliers. A woman who is a boxer is undoubtedly a lot stronger than many men. A man could also have a lot more feminine traits than than the everage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | cringeScreed | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...e that require pure brain exercise, can be be accomplished relatively easier if one h...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...be patient and gentle with the students so as to put them at ease and make an environmen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 593, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: than
...ld also have a lot more feminine traits than than the everage.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, then, thus, as to, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2820.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 579.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87046632124 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72139294827 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519861830743 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 907.2 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6652564966 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.125 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.09375 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.40625 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26038025801 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548068141722 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646627731437 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15075450349 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066406834652 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.