Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of the issue highlights that it is incumbent upon educational institutions to encourage students to focus on fields of study that are more likely to become successful in their future lives. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that students should be able to opt for fields to guarantee their future lives and make a progress day in day out. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, students are pillars of every given society and they play a significant role in the future of every nation. Educators should help them and support students to decide their path wisely and not to do something wrong owing to the fact that they are not mature enough to come up with sound decisions. Broadly speaking, educators and teachers play a key role in the success of students because not only can they help students make a conspicuous progress but also can help having a lucrative career in near future. As a tangible example, if educators patronize students to focus on a field of study that they could be certainly successful, it will revolutionize their lives and provide an opportunity for them to find a decent and well-paid job. In this way, not only can they pay their ways but also can become financially independent. To elucidate more on this issue, hardly can students reach success without the advice of educational institutions and these academic settings should bend over backward and make their efforts so as to help students reach their pinnacle of their lives.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that educators are experienced and knowledgeable enough to guide students for having a better future. If we take a minute to ponder over it, majorities of students might persist on their own belief and many consequences might not come to their mind in the spur of the moment. So, here educators should try to persuade students to think wisely and view life differently. In fact, students can broaden their horizon with the help of educators. For example, students are not mature enough to be informed of future and their decisions. So, educational institutions should provide an opportunity for students to make their path thoroughly. Going into the depth, if educators neglect students and do not help them meticulously, we will soon witness a lagging society.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all context. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, educational institutions should try to respect students' interest and desire. Indeed, they have to take students' attitudes and passions into consideration and help students to decide based on their interest. Not only can students in this way do their tasks properly and completely but also can improve their self-confidence and self-esteem.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-16 | SRIRAM CHAKRAVARTHY | 54 | view |
- "A nationwide survey reveals that the two most-desired home features are a large family room and a large, well-appointed kitchen. A number of homes in our area built by our competitor Domus Construction have such features and have sold much faster and at 59
- "A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. At present, the nearest jazz club is over 60 miles away from Monroe; thus, our proposed club, the C-Note, would have the local market all to itself. In addition, there is ample ev 55
- During the past year Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on the job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts believe that a significant contributing factor in many accidents is fatigue ca 79
- What change would make your hometown more appealing to people your age? 70
- Do agree or disagree with the following statement? High school should allow students to study the courses that students want to study. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to have' or 'have'.
Suggestion: to have; have
... conspicuous progress but also can help having a lucrative career in near future. As a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1041, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nd over backward and make their efforts so as to help students reach their pinnacle of t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all context. Alon...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, as to, broadly speaking, for example, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09387755102 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88500698545 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465306122449 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 791.1 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8435038756 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.454545455 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133199792153 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483887210525 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328155382418 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774772236348 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405498571171 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.