Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
As we all know, there are “so-called” well-established paths to success these days. You are either forced to take streams like Engineering or medicine to make a fortune. But do we tend to forget that most of the successful people we know are those who had the guts to take the path less traveled, the ones which look stinky and the ones which are supposed to have a dead-end? With that thought process in mind, the claim presented does seem to have its own set of shortcomings.
If people like Newton and Einstein had thought of string theory in physics as a dead-end, Most theoretical physicists today would be jobless. If Charles Babbage went for biology instead of designing the greatest invention that humanity has ever seen just because math and computational science were subjects that had unlikely chances of fortune making, how different the world would have been today. Just because a path seems transparent and difficult to move forward doesn't necessarily make it the wrong choice.
Educational Institutions must be responsible for understanding where the interests of each student lie and guiding them through the various career opportunities that lie in front of them in this fast-moving world where the opportunities are endless. These institutions tend to categorize each field as a likely path to success on the mere assumption that it is a field that could maximize remuneration and not it's potential in the upcoming times. Rather than categorizing each career path as a field that could generate most pay, a responsible educational organization must have the ability to be able to find the best path for the particular student to excel in the field and make the path easier for the person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...and the ones which are supposed to have a dead-end? With that thought process in mind, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ansparent and difficult to move forward doesnt necessarily make it the wrong choice. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00523814463 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5889932861 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.3 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158632169897 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050930349406 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496226074339 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910165362178 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622145468161 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.