Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational institutions are partly responsible for the future of the students and their success in the fields that they choose which is why they must have a say in the fields that a student chooses. However, this doesn’t mean that they dissuade the students from pursuing a particular field that might not have a great opportunities but is something that a student is very passionate about.
Many individuals have certain goals that they have set for themselves since they are young and entering a specific field might help them achieve it. They might not be concerned with the dearth of opportunities present in that fields since their aim is to attain their goals. There are copious examples in sports where the children, when they were young might have been persuaded to drop the sport that they liked since excelling in sports is very tough and might not have intended results. If they had heeded their advice we might not have had great Olympians like Michael Phelps, P V Sindhu and Abhinav Bindra. These are examples where not following their dreams would have been detrimental to their careers and would have left them feeling that their goals are unaccomplished.
Students having a liking for a field that is not in demand may not like the options that have great opportunities in the future. If a student doesn’t enjoy doing what he loves there is no way for him to succeed in that field. A student who loves to write and is good at it might be discouraged from following a career in literature since one might argue that the success in a literature related field is much tougher than say in computer related field. However, if the student doesn’t show any interest in coding or lacks the motivation to code, he will never be able to succeed in computer science. Therefore, persuading a student to change his field because of lack of opportunities will not guarantee him success in any other field if he lacks the basic liking for the other field.
Even if a student, falling to the incessant persuation of the college changes his career there is no surety of him going up the ranks to be the best in the field. He might have been better off studying the field that he enjoyed. With the probability of not have success in both fields, he might have been much happier had he chosen the field he loved since he would have been doing that he is really passionate about.
However, many a time the students are unaware about the fields that they are choosing since they are seeing it from an outside perspective. Someone who has been in that field or seen people suffer in a particular field might be better at gauging the problems one might face in the future. Colleges through their alumni have much more knowledge about this and might not want their current students to face problems in the future.
Having said that, dissuading a student from choosing a field of study that might not have a very bright is not best approach for the colleges as it can have detrimental effects on the career of the students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- THE BEST WAY TO TEACH IS TO PRAISE POSITIVE ACTIONS AND IGNORE NEGATIVE ONES.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 68
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the positi 58
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre 62
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opportunity'?
Suggestion: opportunity
...cular field that might not have a great opportunities but is something that a student is very...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m following a career in literature since one might argue that the success in a li...
^^
Line 6, column 109, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the best'.
Suggestion: not the best
...dy that might not have a very bright is not best approach for the colleges as it can hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... effects on the career of the students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70919324578 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50721110452 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.40712945591 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5904482303 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.105263158 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0526315789 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.31578947368 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211887510744 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830983777539 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635979401082 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139391831687 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816184109141 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 12.1743820225 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.