Educational institutions, mainly high school and above, play a pivotal role in shaping the prospective career of an individual. While it will be beneficial for the students to receive a career suggestion based on his/her performances in certain areas of education, it is going a bit far in stating it is the responsibility of the institution in dissuading students from pursuing certain fields.
A student will most likely form a predilection towards a field based on his interests and insights gained in Pre-University College or School. Though there are more chances for these interests being aligned along those fields in which the particular student scores better and can do well in future, it is by no means an all inclusive scenario. Some might choose a field based solely on their interest independent of their current performances in those areas. These students can do amazingly well too owing to their undying interest and grit. On the other hand, as the only cue of educational institutions for any decision regarding the likeliness of a student’s success in a particular field is the their performance, these students would have dissuaded by their school in the first place because of their initial poor performances, and have consequently missed the later good part.
Additionally, some students would have little idea about what field to be pursued further and may end up taking rather a broader range of fields, and this is beneficial too since they would be knowledged in a variety of topics and can be useful in current society where we need more global scholars. This wouldn’t be highly unlikely too if educational institutions have persuasive in otherwise discouraging the students. Nevertheless, a career based suggestion would always help a student in gathering inputs and eventually aiding them to take a better informed decision about future.
Conclusively, a persistent dissuasion by educational institutions from pursuing fields would be rather inefficient to career of a student since such observations by the educational institutions is more likely to be based on the current performance of the student rather than on what can be done in the future. However, as mentioned earlier a informative career suggestion can be beneficial to a prospective student.
- As people rely more and more on technology, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- TOEFL integrated writing: Endotherms 3
- woman in a white dress belongs to James McNeill Whistler. may be written by another painter 73
- Eco certification and American wood companies (Integrated)Reading Section: In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological stan 80
- In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of thisphenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...r student scores better and can do well in future, it is by no means an all inclusive sce...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...apos;s success in a particular field is the their performance, these students would have ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e future. However, as mentioned earlier a informative career suggestion can be be...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29234972678 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17149567914 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516393442623 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.4805930859 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.416666667 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.21951772744 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293301038994 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102501263303 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692952808461 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179637888202 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129164196492 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.