Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Education plays a significant role in the growth of an individual and overall development of a society. Educational institutions are the driving force behind providing quality education and honing the various skills of an individual. Though, to some extent educational institutions can dissuade students from pursing field of study in which they are unlikely to succeed, it is not always recommendable.
I believe that educational institutions are responsible for providing quality education and nurture the growth of an individual and make him a professional in the field of his choice. They have all the knowledge and resources which can help students in the correct path of success and vision. No matter how learned or skilled a person is, they may be poor critiques in finding the true potential of an individual. Take an instance of Michael Jordan, He is one of the most enthusiastic persons one can see on basketball court. One of his coaches bullied him saying he was unfit to play this game and has been terminated from the team. Later, it is a well-known fact that he is one of the mosts loved and greatest player the country has ever produced.
The term "Success" has a plethora of definitions. One say being monetarily rich is success and some other say achieving or pursuing his goal is success. So, the definition of success depends on each individual. In India, due to high poverty level it is said that young people are the sole earners of his or her family. So, they take up courses out their interest for the quest or hunger to earn money to attain financial stability and this can help them become true professionals in that field. So, to dissuade students from their field of study is a judgemental decision on part of educational institutions.
However, there are some instances where putting down the interest of students have benefited to both the organization and individual. Take an example of, Mahendra Singh Dhoni, initially he started his career practicing football and had no interest in playing other sport. Later, one of his coaches noticed his potential of wicket-keeping and trained him in that field which not only helped him to grow as an individual but also brought reputation to the institution.
To sum up, educational institutions should not dissuade students from continuing in the field in which they are not likely to succeed instead provide them various opportunities and platforms that help them to realize their true potential and learn to become better individuals and citizens.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 78
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 79
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05700712589 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96694457038 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510688836105 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6346101369 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.052631579 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84210526316 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352792047084 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101674286899 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136850347443 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210590148267 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113847625342 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.