Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Education plays a significant role in nurturing the growth of an individual. It is claimed that myriads of people accord with students graduating in their own interest. However, some have developed an outlook that they should study courses that aid them in future related to science and technology. I accord with the former notion. In this essay, I will elucidate both the views and substantiate with supporting examples.
To commence with, university students who adhere to study on their own choice will aid the individual boost their self-esteem and self-confidence to do better and reach higher ranks in hierarchy. Consequently, this will enhance or bring out their unique skill where they perform to their true potential and endeavour their accomplishments. To illustrate, a recent study by “National Literacy Agency” has stated that 85% of the students who picked the course out of their interest have succeeded in their goal irrespective of repercussions. Furthermore, this kind of study will aid both mental and physical health. It keeps them refreshed, relaxed, and rejuvenated.
However, having a deeper insight into the future courses might aid in becoming financially stable but students do not find satisfaction and cannot live in tranquillity. With the advancements in technology, many started working on statistics and predicting the patterns or trends. Although, current trend might have chances for certain courses, we cannot assure that this course will be fruitful in future. This might cause unemployment thus leading to Poverty. For example, a latest article by “The Hindu” said that 90% of students who had taken courses believing in the future pattern are not interested to work in their profession as it is causing mental health ailments.
To recapitulate, students should take up courses out of their interest rather believing in the technological trends. This will have significant benefits to the individual as well they can bring name and fame to the nation.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 79
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 79
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ssure that this course will be fruitful in future. This might cause unemployment thus lea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...t thus leading to Poverty. For example, a latest article by “The Hindu” said that...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38853503185 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99832941978 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9752831313 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5294117647 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19408131477 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602216479152 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604751108731 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127487432116 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452449396433 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ssure that this course will be fruitful in future. This might cause unemployment thus lea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...t thus leading to Poverty. For example, a latest article by “The Hindu” said that...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38853503185 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99832941978 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9752831313 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5294117647 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19408131477 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602216479152 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604751108731 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127487432116 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452449396433 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.