Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker asserts that educational institutions should encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. Admittedly, those students may have more incentive to study, they will lose opportunities to learn majors that they are really interested in and are beneficial for the overall society.
Students have incentive to study majors like finance or computer science because they know they if they learn that well, they can step into higher social status and earn a large amount of money. Take business colleges as example. Business colleges are often much more difficult to enter than other colleges like Literature or Art colleges as students want to be engaged in investment banks and securities traders in the future. And as long as one student is enrolled in the business college, he or she will be stuck into the rat race and have to study very hard gain high GDP. Moreover, in order to be competitive in the labor market, he or she has to win internship of big name companies and commit to volunteering and scientific research. Thus, to achieve the dream of being financial elite, those students in Business Colleges are more motivated in studying and having internship.
However, choosing fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers may avoid them purchasing career they are really interested in. For example, if a student is interested in journalism, but she is encouraged to learn Artificial Intelligence and finally choose the major she does not like, she will be upset while learning the hot major. Reading books like Public Opinion by Lippmann and The Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord, she will be regretful for not choosing to learn Journalism in the past and has to use additional time to self-learn courses of Journalism to engage in the field of Journalism when she graduates. Therefore, it is really wasteful of time.
In addition, only learning majors like finance and computer may prevent students being devoted in fields that are really beneficial for the well-being of the residents in the overall society. MPP is a good example. It is a major that prepare students to do jobs in non-governmental organizations like Humane Society and International Organizations like the United Nation. Working in those NGOs cannot earn as much money like working in investment banks and internet companies, but can help to protect animals, promote women empowerment and encourage social understanding of LGBTQs, which are very helpful for the well-being of humans.
In a nutshell, although encouraging students learning fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers can give them more incentives to study, they will not be enrolled in fields that they will like and are helpful for the overall society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-24 | z.salahshoor | 50 | view |
2019-11-23 | kook | 66 | view |
2019-11-19 | jessie_llj | 66 | view |
2019-11-08 | ko_tik | 75 | view |
2019-10-30 | dvtien95 | 50 | view |
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States. "For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses. Last year, however, all o 69
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 83
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 75
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13100436681 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.774709738 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458515283843 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1387740998 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.235294118 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9411764706 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214503240594 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829857113545 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116278639794 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16315877867 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922568588114 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.