Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The improvement of education system has always been a controversial issue among teachers, students, parents and officials. The prompt states that the interest of the students should be considered in planning of the courses. In my point of view, I mostly disagree with this statement and I will explain my reasons now.
To begin, each course has special materials that should be covered during the semester by the teacher. If students do not like the content, teachers have not permission to change the material or the subjects. Thus, considering the interest of the student may not possible for all of the courses. For instance, Physics course in the high school should cover some basic principle like first and second rules of Newton. If students do not like these content and teachers want to change material to the subject that attract students, not only they have bias form their goals, but also the teacher may punish if he or she do such a change. The above example illustrates that interests of the students may vary with the goal of the course and the teacher and student should obey the course curriculum.
Moreover, even if we find some courses that teachers could change the content of the course to some extent, again it is not easy job to consider the interest of the students in teaching. Take a history course as an example. In this course, some students may like to discuss about international history, while others maintain that nation history is more attractive and important for them. These conflicting ideas may waste the time of the classes and would not achieve to a conclusion. Therefore, teachers should follow their instructions in teaching each course to avoid any unrelated discussion in their classes.
However, some maintain that considering the interest of students could attract them to the course and they would learn more if we could arrange this option for them. They claim if we could apply the interest of students in some courses, that is possible like exercise or learning English, they spend more time and more efficient on that course. For instance in an English course that has movie watching section, teacher could take students the option to choose the title of the movie among for instance five titles. Then, they feel that their idea matters and would attract to the subjects. Therefore, involving students in the planning of the course would help teachers to attract students to the subject and improve the efficiency of teaching. Besides, students would feel more confident and efficient.
In conclusion, the proposed statement is complicated issue and people may have different ideas. In addition, in different courses may affect differently. In general, I mostly disagree with the statement, since it may divert them from the goal of the course or waste their time for discussing in unrelated issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | KalyaniHarbola | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Bolu | 62 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | varunpandu006 | 50 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 50 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 66
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 52
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 62
- Some people think that the best way to resolve environmental problems is to increase fuel and vehicles prices Do you agree or disagree with the statement 84
- The following is from a recent email from the Diord Corp. Human Resources Manager:“Tobor Technologies found that mental health problems and mental illness were responsible for about 15 percent of employee sick days. Tobor amended its employee insurance 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...est of the student may not possible for all of the courses. For instance, Physics course i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 617, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...lso the teacher may punish if he or she do such a change. The above example illust...
^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fferent courses may affect differently. In general, I mostly disagree with the sta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02109704641 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57052079029 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443037974684 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9765700172 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.47826087 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6086956522 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82608695652 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227520138617 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735403695031 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407599603762 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134521270093 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265067356409 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.