Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
The issue of whether the educators should teach facts to students before they have studied ideas, trends, and concepts or teach them after is a debatable one. On the one hand, if students are taught facts after they study ideas trends and concept they might understand facts well. But on other hands if the facts are taught than it creates interest in student to study that subject with more interest. In my opinion, I partially agree with the suggestion that the students must be taught facts before studying ideas and concepts for two reasons.
To begin with, any new thing or concept introduced to students bring enthusiasm in them to study that topic further. Thus if the students are told about fact than they can study that particular topic with zeal. For instance, if any person is taught about a fact of newly introduced technology if will create a strong urge for him or her to study about that technology. But if they know about that technology their interest will diminish and they will not grasp any new thing that they have not studied about that technology and they can lack the information in that technology.
Further, if students are taught with any difficult fact that is above their intellect level than there are possibilities that they cannot understand it and may psychologically fear about to study about that idea because of difficulty. For example, if the 6th-grade student is taught facts of science which should be taught to 12th-grade students they might fear to study that topic in the future. So the fact should be taught to students those who have an understanding of that topic.
This issue of whether to teach students about the fact is a very complex issue. This issue can have both negative and positive effects on student. The educators teaching students about facts depends on the student’s intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | bhavya_vasudeva | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | arubhardwaj | 54 | view |
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities. Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual w 69
- An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia — the scent of lavender flowers — has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where 53
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The issue of whether the educators shoul...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g ideas and concepts for two reasons. To begin with, any new thing or concept ...
^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...sm in them to study that topic further. Thus if the students are told about fact tha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k the information in that technology. Further, if students are taught with any...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have an understanding of that topic. This issue of whether to teach students ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90127388535 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51815792102 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43949044586 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7699098357 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333876756592 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154236037544 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103322715164 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227084016693 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866904123181 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.