Every individual in a society has a responsability to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
At a first glance, it sounds a fair argument giving the core of what justice means and espouse. One may agree that unfair laws are biased to provide rights to just a part of the society and the definition of justice is based on treating everyone equally. Thus everything that asides that configuration should be neglected by people.
However, society is based on rules. Since the begining of modern civilization, laws were created to provide organization to the members of a society. And the effectiveness of that organization depends on the obeyance of the conclusions made by the legislators. If everyone decides what is supposed to obey or disobey, laws would not be necessary and this organization would turn into an anarchy.
The interpretation of fairness is not a deterministic matter, so if one choose to obey just what he or she consider a fair issue, there would be no law at all. Considering the normal functioning of governamental organizations, legislators make laws based on their interpretation of what is fair or not, taking into cosideration what they think is the best for the society as a whole, and what is not. But since such conclusions are subjective, what is stated as fair by their eyes could possibly not be by the others'.
As an example, if someone kills another person because he or she tried to steal from him, being prosecuted and convicted for that action could sound extremelly unfair to the former. On the other hand, for others, killing is a crime independent of the circunstances. Therefore, givin that unfairness is more an interpretation than an assertion, the obeyance of laws should not be an individual choice.
Shifting gears to an other field of justice, let's considering the taxes imposed by the government on its citzens as another example. Taxes are much more detrimental to impoverished people than they are to wealthy ones. But as a society, everyone has to pay for them. By the perspective of the poorest ones, this is unfair. On the other hand, others could allegate that all members should be taken as equal, and for that reason, once taxes are mandatory, every member of that society should pay for it.
Fairness and its counterpart are interpretations which change by the perspective of the person assessing it. Giving its beliefs, past experiences, enviroment and several other variables. For that reason, laws are created so that everyone suceptible to its applicability could be charged for not following them. Thus, it should not be an individual option to decide to which of them to obey or not. Otherwise their simple existance would not be warranted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Nicole Metzner | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 29
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... is based on treating everyone equally. Thus everything that asides that configurati...
^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'considers'.
Suggestion: considers
... one choose to obey just what he or she consider a fair issue, there would be no law at ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...e, what is stated as fair by their eyes could possibly not be by the others. As an example,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 19, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...individual choice. Shifting gears to an other field of justice, lets considering the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 130, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...erson assessing it. Giving its beliefs, past experiences, enviroment and several other variables...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 399, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...decide to which of them to obey or not. Otherwise their simple existance would not be war...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97949886105 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99623312579 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476082004556 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9467253189 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0434782609 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0869565217 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26086956522 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141294583681 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392975284694 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457984030128 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776520477184 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03579712305 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.