Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position state examples.
While obeying laws is basic responsibility of an individual, depending on circumstances one can become an outlaw if he/ she perceives injustice due to unjust laws. History has shown us that it is not eccentric for riots to breakdown when a group of people suffer injustice, to exemplify, the cruel Czars rule in Russia came to an end after devastating World War 1. The orthodox practices like Sati, Child marriage which treated as social norms were eradicated from Hinduism by persistent efforts of socialists like Raja Ram Mohan Roy in India, The abolition of these practices laid foundations for gender equality in India.
Under certain dilapidated situations, we can breach laws and stick to our core moral values. Examples: Due to unexpected drought if agricultural fields get destroyed in a region, the concerned official can sanction more than permitted amount of reservoir water to that region. Any individual can break traffic signal to save a patient in his/her vehicle.
In any country, laws which were just and applicable for a period of time in past can become unjust at present. Like, in India social discrimination against Dalits (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes) was rescinded as Dr. B.R Ambedkar drafted Reservation policy in constitution of India in 1949; though this policy eradicated the socio-economic inequalities in consequent years, at present scenario it also helps Dalits to contrive competitive processes of getting jobs. Due to this the other caste’s people for whom Reservation policy is not applicable may suffer injustice. In such situations every individual in a society should strive for equal justice. Amendments to existing laws often take place to ensure justice is done to all sectors of people at present scenario.
However, the suddenly broken frenzied rebellions cause unintended deteriorate effects even if the goal of rebellions is for justice. So, non-violent, properly planned, effectively analysed methods should be implemented to seek justice. For example Gandhi through non-violent efforts brought independence to India, which could not be done by many rebellious leaders of India whose futile, violent methods implemented by them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-16 | chaitanyaok | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written byDr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist,visited the island of Tertia and concluded from hisobservations that children in Tertia were reared byan entire village rathe 18
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree to the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative actions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent you agree or disagree with the recommendation made. Describe specific circumstances in adopting recommendation would or wouldn 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 16
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ws which were just and applicable for a period of time in past can become unjust at present. L...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: R
...Scheduled Tribes was rescinded as Dr. B.R Ambedkar drafted Reservation policy in ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43823529412 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98256032461 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664705882353 0.4932671777 135% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.356465806 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.071428571 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907335319334 0.243740707755 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322453218718 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401671153852 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0473518818454 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247152776919 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.