The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.
Self-knowledge is an ability which is discerned after facing diverse experiences in life. The writer cites that in order to accomplish to this statement of knowledge, the familiar has to be rejected. The fact that unfamiliar aspects of the personality face us with a new understanding of our features is undisputable, however, I believe that by considering the familiar, we can learn the real aspects of our lives.
The progress of our personality, is based on the environment we grew up in as well as the experiences we faced. Numerous Psychotherapists who are dealing with clients with different circumstances, allocate some of their sessions to increase their understandings about the backgrounds of their patients. People with various backgrounds, show different behaviors. In order to discern these features, the events which contributed to these actions should be rooted out. It is pointless to search for unfamiliar facts which sometimes never show up in specific personalities. For instance, there are people who lived in poverty and these sufferings evoke features which have never been induced in wealthy people. Knowledge with the background, contributes to a better understanding about the reasons of specific features of the person.
In addition, unfamiliar facts face people with the undiscovered aspects of their personalities, however, repeating the same responses and activities in life will make people familiar with these patterns. If someone doesn’t show a specific pattern, it is not established in his or her personality and ignoring the familiar patterns and focusing on finding undiscovered features will be futile to develop self-knowledge.
Although people never know how they’re going to act after facing an unpredicted situation, but their response is usually based on their backgrounds. For example, if we put various people in the same condition such as a decline in food supplements, individuals who had this experience in their life, know better how to deal with this problem which is due to their familiarity with their abilities.
In conclusion, the knowledge of people about themselves is based on their experiences and knowledge about how they gained these experiences. By rejecting the familiar facts, the progress of self-knowledge will be futile due to the importance of known aspects have on the evolution of the personality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-27 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ataraxia-m | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. 83
- sop 70
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems. 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 63
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...arn the real aspects of our lives. The progress of our personality, is based o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47696476965 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27524462086 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50135501355 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1590116854 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.3125 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137393064163 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539205634488 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706809300818 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106343390641 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899187503939 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.