The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.
Dr. APJ abdul kalam once told that "rejecting what world has can lead you to produce what world needs.", when you expand your learning ability by learning from what is already known from ages, you can expand your knowledge in that field. The author claims that rejecting the familiar can lead you to increase your self-knowledge. It is true that once you start thinking out-of-the-box you can learn many different things and can expand your knowledge. However, rejecting the familiar can not always lead you to a success in learning.
In 2009, Dr. APJ abdul kalam had made a missle which was called 'The Next Generation' , his missle structure was completely different from previously made missile were in India. He said "I never tried to upgrade the exsisting missile, indeed i wanted to make a new from the scratch" , this inspired many young scientist to think out of the box and should not rely on upgrading the already made artifacts. In the above example, it can be said that rejecting the familiar knowledge can lead us to learn something new and can lead us to a completely new and significant artifact.
However, consider the case of biology, where scientist expand their understanding by researching more on what every generation of new findings has already been made. It is completely foolhardy to make a different theory about the 'evaluation of mankind', if it is already been found out and accepted by the whole world. Instead, accepting these facts and learning those first can lead you to understand more about the particular field. The above hypothesis tells us that we cannot completely reject the previous findings to learn about that field.
In conclusion, it is very difficult to make such a nuance decision whether to reject the familiar or not in order to increase your understanding about self-knowledge. Sometimes in order to make a artifact which should be completely different from what made before, we have to reject the familiar and learn what different we can make. Also, in some field it is totally foolhardy to reject the familiar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-27 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ataraxia-m | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 60
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 58
- The first step to self knowledge is rejecting the familiar 16
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complain 55
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Dr. APJ abdul kalam once told that &apos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t thinking out-of-the-box you can learn many different things and can expand your knowledge. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s lead you to a success in learning. In 2009, Dr. APJ abdul kalam had made a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sle which was called The Next Generation , his missle structure was completely dif...
^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...o upgrade the exsisting missile, indeed i wanted to make a new from the scratch&a...
^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ted to make a new from the scratch' , this inspired many young scientist to t...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...letely new and significant artifact. However, consider the case of biology, w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olhardy to make a different theory about the evaluation of mankind, if it is alre...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... findings to learn about that field. In conclusion, it is very difficult to m...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f-knowledge. Sometimes in order to make a artifact which should be completely dif...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0144092219 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82851420481 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463976945245 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5734071643 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175962269791 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815723994487 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784388669278 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113400447801 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622713984729 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Dr. APJ abdul kalam once told that &apos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t thinking out-of-the-box you can learn many different things and can expand your knowledge. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s lead you to a success in learning. In 2009, Dr. APJ abdul kalam had made a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sle which was called The Next Generation , his missle structure was completely dif...
^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...o upgrade the exsisting missile, indeed i wanted to make a new from the scratch&a...
^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ted to make a new from the scratch' , this inspired many young scientist to t...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...letely new and significant artifact. However, consider the case of biology, w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olhardy to make a different theory about the evaluation of mankind, if it is alre...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... findings to learn about that field. In conclusion, it is very difficult to m...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f-knowledge. Sometimes in order to make a artifact which should be completely dif...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0144092219 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82851420481 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463976945245 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5734071643 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175962269791 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815723994487 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784388669278 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113400447801 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622713984729 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.