Whether or not, the formal education has kept humans mind at bay has been a hot point of discussion among biologist who specifically study the human behaviors. Though it not difficult to find consensus about the learning process of humans, since their early evolution. But how that learning process takes place is still argued by many. Some theorists believe that formal education has debilitate the capability of humans to think freely and in more innovative way while others buttress the claims that formal education is primary and vital ingredient for the development of human brains. We are going to analyze these claims step by step in the following paragraphs.
First of all, let us consider those who accredit formal education behind the success story of humanity. They believe that all the technical, medical and other advancements, to alleviate mankind, were made possible only because of the formal education. These theorists’ questions that how are innovations possible without the premise set by the predecessor scientists. For example, if our ancestors would not have invested their time in research and did not jolted it down on papers for us, how could one take the research further? Moreover, there are plenty of findings that prove the need of formal education for brain development, acclimatizing brain to cope up with stress and strain as a part of training, and eventually innovations to cope of with the encountered difficulties.
Secondly, there are people who presume that no formal education is required for the development of brains and in one way or another it is formal education that limit of thinking capability by forcing unnatural rules such as social responsibility, monetary desires and pursuit of happiness. They argue that the human mind works to its full potential when set free. Consider for example that I primitive times humans have made similar advancements, be it medical or technological, at faster pace than are doing it today. So formal education has only thwarted the human capability leading future generations vulnerable to its consequences.
So in conclusion, different presumptions might prevails in the world today but there is not even a hint of doubt that formal education renders people for freely than any other since the aid by technological advancement has rendered people to live to their own expectations
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 83
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 58
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not, the formal education has kept humans m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'debilitated'.
Suggestion: debilitated
...rists believe that formal education has debilitate the capability of humans to think freel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 619, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'claims'' or 'claim's'?
Suggestion: claims'; claim's
...n brains. We are going to analyze these claims step by step in the following paragraph...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'jolt'
Suggestion: jolt
...sted their time in research and did not jolted it down on papers for us, how could one...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26052631579 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93705314277 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2594092297 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.266666667 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157587837359 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498726671781 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301070675424 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945445375134 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230647636079 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.