The function of science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each.
The world has grown over the last few centuries with art and science joining hands together. From the renaissance of Italy in the 14th century to the industrial age that spawned in England in the 18th to 19th century, humankind is able to cherish and enjoy the fruits from these two sectors. The statement above shows a step motherly approach to art while favoring science. I believe that value of art and science has the values of reassuring and not just science being able to the fact.
First of all, the statement states that the function of science is to reassure. The author considers science to be a boon. Science has indeed been a boon for human kind. Through science important discoveries were made that changed the face of the world. From the understanding of the phenomenon of gravity to the invention of steam engines laid foundation to the technology that changed the world in the 18th century. From the understanding of the principles of relativity to the invention of aero planes, the world was in the technological peak in the early 20th century. Maverick scientists went on further to create computers, automobiles and even sent a man to the moon. Science continues to be a boon to us in every way. Imagine the situation if automobiles were not present in this busy world? Similarly, imagine the condition wherein radical scientists didn’t push their ambition to irradiate smallpox?
However, while science has its benefits at one end of the string, one shouldn’t overlook the insecurities and convolute problems it has brought with it. The advent of the 20th century saw the world facing one of the gruesome and macabre wars in history. Science and Technology did make people to avaricious for power and money that led to the World War 1 and World War 2. The effects of these wars have not left the mind of innocent individuals who were adversely affected by it. Similarly, the age of digitalization has spawned a multimillion industry of cybernetic services which include the internet, computers, smart phones, and even the watches. These devices while providing services at one end has left our identity open to the world. The world is facing the issues of cybernetic attacks which threatening the identity of an individual.
Secondly, the author states that the purpose of art is to upset. The statement suggests that the author has some jaundice against art. Art is something that has broad meaning, and cannot be explained within a statement. Art include many forms such as books, poems, dance, music and even the movies that we enjoy at theatres. As per my view, we humans tend to enjoy every form art from time immemorial. From the plays of Shakespeare, to the poems of Robert Frost to books of Stephen king and the comics by Stan lee, we enjoy art to the maximum. When an individual looks to a type of dance performance, he or she gets captivated by the performances of talented dances. Even actors have captured over imaginations with their breathtaking performances. In art, the perofrances and the content changes accrding to the themes. Themes can vary from tragedy to comedy. These themes make us thing over the message the actors and the back screen iconoclasts are trying to show us, the people.Therefor one cannot state that te purpose of art is just to upset.
To conclude, the world has benefitted from the usage of science and art. Each of these segments have a deep impact one’s life. The statement above suggest that the purpose of science is just to reassure while art is not. I belaive that this is not true. In order to strive and prevail all the challenges put forward to us, we must embrace the values and science and art and use the benefits these wonderful sectors give us
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | tannistha2019GREessays | 50 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Mroza | 54 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | pritmodi | 58 | view |
| 2018-09-15 | Antony Urmise Jose | 58 | view |
| 2017-04-26 | akshatha ts | 50 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer." 66
- “As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious” 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The function of science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 225, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'includes'.
Suggestion: includes
...ot be explained within a statement. Art include many forms such as books, poems, dance,...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 983, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefor
...lasts are trying to show us, the people.Therefor one cannot state that te purpose of art...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce and art. Each of these segments have a deep impact one's life. The state...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 101.0 58.6224719101 172% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3108.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 641.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84867394696 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0316973083 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71462334113 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 312.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486739469579 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 961.2 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.2370786517 183% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1162084982 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3243243243 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35135135135 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235982769336 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577186896648 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070857446136 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134487963187 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662304138792 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.