Government officials should rely on their own judgement rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Government officials are, in principle, representatives that are elected by the public. Thus, it is their utmost duty to serve the people and the country for its well being. Still, there may be disputes in deciding whether their actions should be done through individual contemplation or wholly on behalf of the public’s interest. This essay will provide several certain situations and contexts where politicians and officials are required to behave either by one’s own judgement or by the people’s opinion.
Firstly, in general circumstances, political figures need to carry out the will of the people especially when considering the elements of basic needs and living conditions. The most well known example is the New Deal Policy launched by F.D. Roosevelt. This policy came out solely to alleviate the economic hardship and resolve unemployment in terms of enhancing the deteriorated quality of life due to the financial recession that happened in the late 1920s. That is, it can be said that the main drive force for implementing certain policies can be easily discerned by putting the public’s interest into priority. As nations can be prosperous only through a stabilized public health and social order, the government shall be in standby position in terms of serving the basic needs and interests of their people.
However, when looking into certain situations such as a national emergency or moments when collective violence and atrocity is prevalent, government officials ought to be contemplative and may even dare to take a choice that might go against the public’s will. For example, faced by the worldwide spread of Covid 19, many governmental officials are dealing with the difficulty in persuading their citizens to take vaccines and wearing proper masks. It has become controversial whether these collective behaviors are safe enough and many people have started to show anxiety and precariousness. Even in some regions, protests and riots have happened in terms of gainsaying the governmental proposal. Yet, however, if the government had postponed the vaccination, then there is a strong likelihood that the whole world might fall into more danger.
Similarly, when reminding of the history of Nazi regime and several other fascist communities, the governmental officials have the duty not only to take a break and ponder on the seriousness of the potential violence against other nations or groups of people, but also to dare to act against the public. It is widely known that the Holocaust had happened just because nobody paused the implementation even though there were some people who felt contrite in devastating the basis of human dignity. Thus, it is important for governments to have enough discernment in taking any action.
Thus, the conclusion now stands that the government has to have its discernment in choosing whether it is more proper to act as a servant of the public or it is rather wiser not to follow the enthusiasm or radical thoughts of the people. In this regard, we may have to have wary vigilance in evaluating the behaviors and actions of the political figures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 75 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ahasan | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ahasan | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Soumyadip Kar 1729 | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 16
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 66
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero 83
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 58
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and actions of the political figures.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2625.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21868787276 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89796467776 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522862823062 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1826202397 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.157894737 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4736842105 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184281578199 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533657842586 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461130065563 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100226015873 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681826304489 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.