Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than
unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the present world, we live in a more democratic society where everybody has a duty to make their society better. In each society, we democratically elect government officials whose prime duty is to make our society better. Sometimes government officials' judgments do not match people’s opinions. The above prompt sets out that government officials should rely on their judgment rather than unquestionably carry out the people’s will. While I concede that peoples’ options are imperative for better decisions, in my opinion, I mostly agree that government officials should rely more on their judgments for three reasons.
To begin with, gubernatorial candidates are more capable of understanding the world politically than others. In other words, Government officials are more capable of comprehending the problems in our society since they have to consider wider views than people. For example, people in the city are concerned about the lack of schools in the city but 6 nearby schools are 2 Kilometers away from the town where people can easily commute daily. In response to the people’s demand government officials decided to institute a public library in the town that everyone can visit free of charge. This example shows that sometimes government officials should rely on their judgment otherwise unquestioningly carrying out the people’s demand may cause a waste of government property which may affect the growth of the society in one way or another.
Furthermore, in general, government officials have to view the wider picture of society. Sometimes people’s demand only emphasizes their predicaments which often miss out on the big picture. Let’s take an example, in response to the people’s demand of instituting a hospital the government officials built a new golf course to attract more tourists to their town which can increase the revenue significantly and with that money not only they can institute a hospital but also many more things like schools, new roads, etc. This example illustrates that sometimes we need to consider the bigger picture in order to be more lucrative. Thus relying on their judgment government officials develop the society.
However, there are times when people’s opinion is legitimate. In other words, people's concerns are based on practical scenarios which they suffer from this government officials sometimes can not understand the futility of the dilemma of the people. For example, people’s concerns about road condition in the city should be appeased by government officials since bad roads is the main reason for many fatal accidents and intense traffic in the city. By the above example, one can say that sometimes government officials should unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve in order to make their social progress since people can understand the problems more clearly than government officials who do not suffer from the problems.
Despite these reasons, unquestionably carrying out people’s demands has its merit in that it emphasizes all the problems of the society by which people are suffered every day but the apparent advantages are overshadowed by the possible disadvantages which are far more severe in nature. Thus only carrying out people’s demand that they serve is not advisable, relying on their own judgment which also includes people’s opinions is preferable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 75 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Soumyadip Kar 1729 | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | yomi idris | 50 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | sag15 | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as muc 66
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls around the country The surface of a section of Route 101 paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous 58
- The following appeared in the Health section of the Greenhorne Gazette Motilac is a substance that occurs naturally in the human digestive tract Many consumers of dietary supplements containing motilac report significant easing of digestive discomfort aft 68
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets Specifically dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease In light of these findings Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership wi 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...es which are far more severe in nature. Thus only carrying out people’s demand that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in general, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2867.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38909774436 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87993665466 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447368421053 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 894.6 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9993137575 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.523809524 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355723094644 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125959017945 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921648972124 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230607355509 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238564259335 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.