“Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The issue is concerned about whether government officials should follow the public's will or follow the decisions on their own judgement. It is clear that these officials are either nominated by someone who was elected by the public or directly elected by the public. Whatever it is, the officials have close relationship with them. However, even with this relationships, it is necessary for officials to follow their own judgment.
Admittedly, most of the government officials are nominated by the politician who are elected by the public or directly elected by the public. Therefore, it is mandatory for government officials to follow the demotic will. It is a nonsense to renouncing the demotic assertion since it might be nullifing the official's fundamental. Moreover, there are some cases, for example South Korea's former president Gunhae Park, that the officials are impeached by not following the public wills. Therefore, it might be reasonable for officials to grant public wills.
However, following the majority of people's will might lead to unwanted result. This circumstances can lead to populism which is critical in managing the government. In the case of Argentina, their former president made several government policies to grant public's wills resulted a catastrophic economic crisis that led to severe inflation. Moreover, in the case of Venesulela, this problem became so serious that became a economic calamity. The people living in that country cannot afford simple essential product leading a total distruction of the country.
Moreover, the government officials typically have more access on some information that normal people do not know about it. Since the officials know more about the specific situation on to it, it is likely to make more rational decision than the public. For example, millitary related information is strictly confidential, it is likely that the government officials to take better decisions than the public does. It might be necessary to persuade the public for that decision, but the decision should not be influenced by public.
In conclusion, it is understandable that the officials should follow the public's will since their origin is based on the public. However, there are many cases that did not go well on just following the public needs. Moreover, there might be some discrepencies that the decision made by the public and the officials. Since the officials normally have more information about the specific event, it is necessary to make decisions on by itself, seperating from public's wills.
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them 50
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather a 55
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather t 55
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the president of Amburg s Chamber of Commerce Last October the city of Belleville installed high intensity lighting in its central business district and vandalism there declined within a month The city of Am 70
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction c 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ationship with them. However, even with this relationships, it is necessary for offi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s problem became so serious that became a economic calamity. The people living in...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33746898263 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86388694255 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429280397022 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1845562832 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.7727272727 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135621822681 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516136721668 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407684592425 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893727103589 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364274577712 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.