Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
A government was formed to basically manage, discuss the problems of and elevate the people of the nation. The prompt suggests that the government officials should have a judgement of their own instead of directly acting following what the people tell. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the promt for 3 reasons.
Firstly, the area where a government official commands over has a diverse audience to be catered to. There is a possibility of difficult situations arise in such an environment. To illustrate this, consider several communities in a society and due to some unwanted circumstances the communities become bitter rivals to each other. In such a scenario, some people might expect the government official to act on their side and the others would want the official's verdicts on their side. For such convoluted situations, it is better for the government official to have a judgement of his own to mitigate further exacerbation of the matter at hand.
Secondly, A government official is elected by the people. Thus emphasizing that the official should be acting on their terms. It is because of the people the official gains the power to govern them. If the government official fails to do so, he loses the trust of the people he serves. For instance, a majority of people in the society have been complaining about the traffic on the main road for a very long time to the government official. The people have also come up with a plan to mitigate this traffic. But here, the official instead of listing and acting according to the people, takes his own jugdement which results in a gaffe, disappoints the electing majority and thus results in losing faith and trust.
Finally, to the official's benefit, he must look out for satisfying majority of people as possible. People at the ground-level are more exposed to the daily inconveniences. These people making known the issues faced by them and the official gets to it without a thought will help in building a strong society. For example, there a mishandling of garbage, the people want the official to make strict rules for this. Upon laying the strict rules. The official is nationwide appreciated for the good doing in the society.
This is a complicated prompt to strongly assert in one direction. There is are too many expectations and emotions involved in this. Thus, the government official should pragmatically able to judge a situation and according to that make a choice, that is to take their own judgement or act without question according to the people he serves.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview When the Grandview Symphony was established ten years ago the city of Grandview agreed to provide the symphony with annual funding until the symphony became self sustaining T 50
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and Fitch Realty Adams Realty is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast Fitch has 25 many of whom work only 66
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, as for, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93006993007 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80936168574 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496503496503 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4051684946 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.125 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204821715435 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612456559507 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418779898529 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126410744212 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382248778492 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.