Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni

The very first thing to acknowledge is that the term government officials is not just restricted to elected politicians. They may contain officers of the administration, police, military, foreign emissaries etc.There are some government officials elected through the process of voting. They are required to carry out their duty for the effective running of the society. I mostly agree that government officials should rely on their own judgement rather than carrying out the will of the people for few reasons listed below.

There is no denying that people elect government officials as they trust them to be their representative who could discuss the problems faced by people and resolve them effectively. Also, it is the duty of the elected official to comply to people's demand. Refusing to do so he or she might face resistance in the future. For example, an elected official in the state of Maharashtra in India after getting elected failed to fulfill his promises that were listed in his election manifestation. People had voted him for the promises he made in the manifestation, the result was after five years when the next election occurred people didn't elect him.

However, just to draw results based on just one aspect would be too specious. In the case of administrative officers those who clear rigorous exams and are trained to take decisions based on the facts, present scenario and on the training they received in their respective academies. They might consider the problems faced by people but after closely monitoring they might take decisions that could oppose the will of the people, this doesn't indicate necessary results cannot be obtained. Taking the case occurred during the covid-19 pandemic, the district administrator imposed lock down against the will of the people who wanted slight relaxations.The result was the same district turned out to be an example in handling in the crisis, registering not more than 10 cases in a month.

Furthermore, government emissaries or ambassador are trained to be diplomatic. In this changing world of power, ambassadors need to be great orators and even better negotiators. If they act according to will of the people they might not achieve the greater goal. For example,many in India want a permanent solution to the Kashmir issue and many might resort even war with its rival nations. But, a diplomat cannot use the language or the judgement of its people, if they do so the nation might be criticized at the world stage. He or she needs to analyze the issue and thus react accordingly which results in the benefit of his or her own country.

Thus, working according to the will of the people might at times sound logical but the government official shouldn't to obliged to do so. Though in some cases and for some government officials judgment of people should be a deciding factor but it cannot be generalized for all the government officials. The most significant thing for a government official is to carry his or her own duty unquestionably for the sake of the betterment of the nation.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...olice, military, foreign emissaries etc.There are some government officials elected t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ty of the elected official to comply to peoples demand. Refusing to do so he or she mig...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... when the next election occurred people didnt elect him. However, just to draw res...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...uld oppose the will of the people, this doesnt indicate necessary results cannot be ob...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...he people who wanted slight relaxations.The result was the same district turned out...
^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...at orators and even better negotiators. If they act according to will of the peopl...
^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , many
...ot achieve the greater goal. For example,many in India want a permanent solution to t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
...anent solution to the Kashmir issue and many might resort even war with its rival nations....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...und logical but the government official shouldnt to obliged to do so. Though in some cas...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2559.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01764705882 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80647148554 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494117647059 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 799.2 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7916281237 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.318181818 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22176480609 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704991580131 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702479703117 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134434852645 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708214951418 0.0667264976115 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.