Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni

Essay topics:

Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

According to the prompt, government officials should depend upon their own judgement rather than unquestioningly support the will of the people whom they serve seem logical in the sense that government officials can use their mental ability precisely to come to any judgement. Although, the share of powers between government officials and people is a subject of conflicts in the long run history or even today. The government officials are chosen with the will of people to fulfill their demands or to solve immediate problems existing in their day to day life. I mostly agree with the given above statement: government officials should use their own intelligence to make effective judgement rather than blindly depend upon the decision of the people whom they take oath to serve.
Firstly, political parties are particularly run the campaign to focus on the problems of people whom they encounter such as unemployment, poor sanitation, improper mobilization of health facilities as well as education to attract the masses towards themselves. And, these political parties won with the suffrage of the people to run the government for a limited time period. During the constraint period, the government officials use their intellectual or mental ability to woo the problems of electorates. The working abilities of the government during his tenure decides his chances of winning in the next election. Thus, government should rely on his cognitive knowledge to make an effective judgement which satisfies the needs of large number of population.
Secondly, people want to feel secure by ensuring all his rights to be protected without any violation within the tenure of government. These includes- right to vote, right to speech, right to live and right to freedom. If people find any of these rights to be suppressive under any governance, they revolt against the government and force the government to resign from the post of authoritative. Thus, government official should think twice before any implementation of their judgement by ensuring no any violation of people rights.
Thirdly, good governance are the results of proper judgement by the leaders of the ruling government. The stabilities depend upon political stability, economic stability as well as military force. For example- The emergence of Dubai from the land of dessert to the city of hub or economic development depend upon the good leadership under Saeed Bin Maktoum, which is regarded as the driving force behind the massive expansion of Dubai through his aid in discovering oils.
However, some of the government officials deceive people through their false support to the problems of people. When such government officials reach to the top position of the country, they betray their voters and do whatever they want and suppress the rights of the people through the acts of totalitarian. Such activities stir heterodox against the government and finally brings instability in the country. For instance, In North Korea the leadership under Kim Jong is a typical example of tyranny governance where people are fear to live under the dictatorship of Kim Jong.
In conclusion, government officials should rely on their intellectual judgement to promote political stability as well as economic stability within the country rather than blindly support on the will of the people whom they are taken oath to serve.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-25 Dipesh1234 75 view
2022-11-09 Soumyadip Kar 1729 66 view
2022-08-24 Sumilak 66 view
2022-07-12 yomi idris 50 view
2022-07-06 sag15 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user me2mahesh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts to be protected without any violation within the tenure of government. These i...
^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...entation of their judgement by ensuring no any violation of people rights. Thirdl...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... his aid in discovering oils. However, some of the government officials deceive people thr...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 101.0 58.6224719101 172% => OK
Nominalization: 43.0 12.9106741573 333% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2849.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29553903346 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84638771027 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455390334572 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 888.3 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.404682133 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.619047619 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09523809524 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281931267672 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882882380015 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767345592493 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151505385413 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942234781755 0.0667264976115 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.