Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The “Soul” of any country is its people and the main purpose or responsibility of any government of a country is to serve these people through their representatives called government officials. So if a government takes any decision without considering the opinions of their citizens will not bear a good result at end of the day. So I totally disagree with the point that government officials should rely on their own judgment rather consulting the people whom they serve.
In any democratic country the government should be “for the people”, “to the people”, and “from the people”. So if a government takes any decision without respecting the above core values of a democratic country then it’s like government is snatching the fundamental rights of the people.
Whenever government officials are planning to implement any new projects or any law in the country or a place where they are serving, if they involve the citizens while planning it may help them in achieving success far better than they achieve without the involvement of the public. For example if a city corporation is planning a development of the city for next five years, it can invite the peoples representatives or any interested people to involve in the planning. They can call for suggestions from people and after thoroughly discussed with the experts and representatives the government can implement the new plan for development of the city. By this people of that locality will be satisfied and also it increases the trust on government officials. End of the day whatever government is doing it will be for the development of there own people, wright?
If decisions taken without consulting the people representatives may cause lot of damage to city or even a country economy. For example In India huge percentage of people lives in villages and their main income is through farming. In 2020 when Indian Prime Minister announced new agricultural laws on farmers, without taking suggestion of farmer representatives it created lot of disappointment from farmers and it reflected in terms of protest. Which almost lasted for two years. Due to which lot of damage has done to Indian economy and even during protest few people lost their precious life.
Therefore it can be better to say that government officials should serve the will of the people and work towards their prosperity, if they don’t and just rely on their own judgment people will actually would not accept them and consequences of this will damage the fundamental principle of a country.
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 50
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words IELTS Writing Task 1 Table 73
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 60
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sentatives called government officials. So if a government takes any decision without...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...“to the people”, and “from the people”. So if government fails to implement any of th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ew plan for development of the city. By this people of that locality will be satisfi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 836, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...doing it will be for the development of there own people, wright? If decisions taken wit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t few people lost their precious life. Therefore it can be better to say that governmen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Therefore it can be better to say that government officials should serve the wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0782396088 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95732566233 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469437652812 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4793660592 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8125 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5625 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262343203875 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097043155552 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075031908288 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163313865387 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635001766483 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.