Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
In contemporary scenario, debates regarding free education have never been higher before as it is today. Here, the author of the prompt explicitly suggests the government to offer free of cost for higher education. I mostly agree with the author's recommendation and defend my thesis based on two compelling arguments with evidences in support of the prompt and a qualification regarding why the thesis is weakened in some scenarios.
Firstly, the cost based education system leads to exponential increase in tuition cost and upsurge in student loan. This not only affect quality of life of graduate student but also seriously hinders national economy. In USA, for instance, there has been more than two hundred percent increase in student loan in past three decades and currently, the student loan has increased more than one trillion. The increase in tuition cost and student loan is due to the obligation for achieving higher education to climb the ladder in the job market.
Secondly, free education system in any country is indicator of thriving nation both economically and socially. Free education releases the burden from the student and channel their energy more on study rather than taking stress about their cost for tuition. For instance, the countries like Norway, Finland, Germany and Spain, have higher index for development such as GDP, unemployment rate, per capita income, and even happiness index. However, in the countries where cost of education is higher, they fall below these country. So, education more or less helps to develop the socio-economic index of any nation.
However, in some senarios, the costly education as shown some positive result as well. The top ten university in the world is mostly dominated by USA and UK, mainly due to the fact that they are able to pay erudite professors higher salary and also are competent in research field. This shows that in some scenarios however, the high cost do have some positive consequences.
In conclusion, the prompt is complex and has several factors to determine whether it is good or bad. But, judging at consequent of different government taking free education policies, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. So I would like to suggest government to make policy for free education.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-24 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
2020-01-04 | terraventu | 83 | view |
2019-12-27 | jha | 50 | view |
2019-12-07 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 54 | view |
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated. 50
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 58
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 83
- Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom. Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning 75
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...gher education. I mostly agree with the authors recommendation and defend my thesis bas...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun helps is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ow these country. So, education more or less helps to develop the socio-economic ind...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19891008174 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74243337824 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555858310627 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3202264165 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147955838253 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541265898668 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514512069381 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878999129973 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463125247473 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.