Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The topic raises the issue that whether the government should focus on today or prepare the country for the future. Indisputably, the present generation must create a world in which our future generation is benefitted by our actions today. Nevertheless, it is equally important to focus on the present. If the government focuses the majority on the future, then the problems of the present will be carried on the future generations too. Thus, I generally agree with the prompt that the government should focus on present-day issues.
First of all, the government is responsible for growth and development in the area in their constituted area. The most important task for the government is to meet up to the needs of the people. To illustrate, a country that is suffering from a high rate of unemployment. People are homeless and dying on the streets. In this circumstance, if the government organization is busy discussing the town planning for future generations, then it might not be useful. The government should focus on ways to get a job to the needy and arrange for shelter homes for its citizens. The government has to ensure that its citizen are getting proper food and water. If the situation is not resolved at this stage it might further lead to new problems like spreading diseases, famine, and economic depression. This might leave the future generation under more problems than could have existed had the government focused on the present. Consequently, the example is further bolstering the main point that the government needs to fight against the issues existing in their country.
Furthermore, the government is also responsible for maintaining the health and hygiene of the citizens. I would like to point out that if a government can not maintain the heath level of its present citizen and presently people are suffering, then it is useless developing vaccines and medicines of diseases that might occur in the future. For example, today the entire world is fighting against the COVID-19 virus. If in this scenario, the government focuses on getting a new arms deal contract to strengthen the security of the nation, then the action is not justified. Specifically, when there are thousands and hundreds of people who are losing their lives daily. The government is required to focus on research to develop vaccines for it, make more and more hospital beds available to the ill citizens and focus on upgrading the health facilities rather than worrying about future attacks and threats. Hence, all the above are evidence above demonstrate that government should work in full force to focus on the present.
Admittedly, preparing for the future should also be on the entire work plan of the government. This is true especially when it comes to space and medical researches, technological and road developments, providing world-class facilities to the citizen. In addition to this, the government ’s plan to develop a non-renewable source of energy, environmental, and wildlife protection is a few more areas where government plans can be extremely helpful. However, this can not form the main focus area of the government. It is good to prepare for the future when the present is secured. But if a countries present is in chaos it is imprudent for the government to make plans for the future. Therefore, the government should have a motto that a stable present today will lead us to a better tomorrow.
In conclusion, although we have to leave a happy and peaceful world for our future with all the advanced technologies and comforts. But, focusing on the present is of utmost importance for a better future. In fact, by developing a stable economy and well-sufficient medical facilities we are building a strong foundation on which the future can flourish. The present government should try its best to resolve the standing problems and issues so that the upcoming government or future should not get caught in solving issues from the past.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago During this same time period 60
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East M 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council Two years ago consultants predicted that West Egg s landfill which is used for garbage disposal would be completely filled within five years During the past two 57
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 61
- The following appeared in a business magazine As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing Promofoods concluded tha 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 481, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...helpful. However, this can not form the main focus area of the government. It is good to p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 36.0 12.9106741573 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3311.0 2235.4752809 148% => OK
No of words: 656.0 442.535393258 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04725609756 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06087906887 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89769504635 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432926829268 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1026.9 704.065955056 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8313673508 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8787878788 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.48484848485 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214689541134 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584602150484 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474583579812 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143417878911 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485586603146 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.