Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
One responsibility of any government is to make the life of its constituents better, both socially and economically. To do this, the government should focus on solving problems that plauging the social and economic well-being of its people. The question is, should government focus on short-term problems or dedicate more time to expected future problems? Both sides of this argument has its advantage and disadvantage.
Solving immediate problems of today, such as improving healthcare amenities, will result in a healthier society. For instance, with the recent COVID infections, a country like Brazil was hit the hardest as its health infrastructures was not well equipped to deal with the overwhelming number of cases in the country. If the government had concentrated on improving the health sector, perhaps many COVID-related deaths could have been avoided.
There is also the education sector which is one that requires immediate attention as it defines the future of any society. In the United State, research has shown that counties that have low budget appropriated to education have a higher crime rate. Places like Chicago which in the past was more prosperous for their art, did not invest well in educating its community. Overtime, this has resulted in higher crime rate in the area as well as even more reduced education standard for its people. The situation may have been different had the government concentrate on education more by building better schools, paying teachers better, creating programs that encourage students to remain in school rather than go for the flashy but fleeting life that exists outside the school walls.
On the other hand, a scenario that supports focusing on long-term problems is the case of preserving natural resources. For example, at the moment, deforestation does not seem like a problem for today. In another 20 years or less that might not be the case. We might not have conducive environment for wildlife, also places for recreational activities such as hiking, camping, e.t.c. If laws are not put in place today to curb felling of tress, we might be looking at a future with many high-rise building but no beautiful greenries.
In conclusion, while it is pertinent for goverments to focus on immediate problems, dedicating time and resource to future problems is also relevant to its long-term posterity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun years is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...oblem for today. In another 20 years or less that might not be the case. We might no...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24473684211 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8898175905 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555263157895 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0786419428 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.235294118 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205456464401 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699528731337 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661374288584 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116499878832 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047793100539 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.