Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
“If future problems are not solved today, then they will be one day’s today problem”. The prompt recommends that Government should not try to solve future problems. In my opinion, I disagree with that suggestion and argue that Government should focus on trying to solve future problems for two reasons.
To begin, future problems ahead of us will be exacerbated if not solved before time. Thus solving the today’s problems can not preclude them and they will be becoming worse day by day. For instance, since the industrialization started most of the forest lands have destroyed and now the climate has became capricious due to that. At that time Government didn’t focus on this problem and let the forests destroyed even there were lot of research published regarding the consequences of the forest cutting. Now the global warming consequences are so high that even Antarctica ice is melting and some places became so hot to live easily. The above example illustrates that if the Government doesn’t focus on solving the future problems then they will be one day’s immediate problem like today’s global warming.
Further, even if we assume that solving today’s immediate problem will solve future problems, Government should still focus on solving future anticipated problems, For example, in 1947 India and Pakistan got separated and both were fighting for a land call ‘Kashmir’ and Indian Government tried to solve the ‘Kashmir’ problem immediately by giving the state a special right than others, without prudently thing about the future, But now Kashmir issue is so big because of that imprudent decision of special right that there are so many killings happening every day. So if the Solution works for today, it does not ensure that it will be as effective as today in the future. The Government should focus on future problems carefully before time otherwise they will be out of hand.
Of course, some argue that in our increasingly globalized economy there is already lot of worsen problems thus it is imperative for Government to focus on these problems. However isn’t that precisely why Government should focus on future problems? If they do so they’re likely to prevent them from becoming worse. They’re likely to solve them in minimal efforts then that will be required later. They’re likely to carve out a ‘new future’ with less immediate problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... have destroyed and now the climate has became capricious due to that. At that time Go...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... Government to focus on these problems. However isn't that precisely why Governmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 445, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...later. They're likely to carve out a 'new future' with less immedi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, still, then, thus, as to, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31538461538 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98228828125 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497435897436 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.185594967 60.3974514979 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.941176471 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396143617282 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158170203595 0.0831039109588 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111283038938 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307966433405 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106092707142 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.