Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Should government focus on the solving the immediate issues? I believe the answer to most of the people is "yes". After all, one of the most critical function of government is to ensure the well-being of its people. But claiming that the government should put more effort on solving the current issues than on future problems is problematic, since living standards of the people also depend on policies that might be finialized in the future. In my opinion, I think the improtance of solving furture issues is , if not the same, greater than just dealing with the problem that a government is facing now.
As I mentioned in the last paragraph, since the main duty of a government is to ensure the long-term well-being of its citizens, a long-term plan for the future must be made in the first place. To cope with the plans, various decisions will be made based on both the current condition and the anticipation for the ultimate result of realizing the plan, which can benefit its citizens in the long run. Consider the interstate highway project, for example; it is undeniable, from today's point of view, that this project has benefited the development of commercial activities, advancement in technology and many other fileds. This project, in my opinion, represents a perfect balance bewteen the consideration for the future and current. Had the US government made a more abitious plan for the transportation, such as a national high speed railroad network, we might not be able to witness the Apollo space program. On the other hand, had the US government focused only on the well-being of citizens at the current level, the national highway might be impossible to build and left with us a nation in which commerce and techology are extermely difficult to develope. In either case, the government would fail to bring its citizens a long-term benefits. So from the standpoint of the duty of ensuring well-being, a balanced focuse should be made on both sides.
Furthermore, other than ensuring the well-being of its citizens, future plans are also important in increasing the competitiveness, which is then coverted into advantages for its citizens, of a country in the world. Just like China's reformation, which largely contributed to the unpresidentd growth of its wealth and technology in the 21th century, in the 1970s. The core idea behind such reformations is to increase the economical condition of the country in the long run. Had the government of China only focused of what it deemed the most important, like the quotas in electrivity and steel production, advanced technologies like DJI drones and Huawei's 5G, which ultimately made China more competitive are hardly imaginable.
Admittedly, there are circumstances under which more emphasis should be put on current issues than on the future plans. But such shift of concentration is only applicable to seldom and urgent cases, which happen seldomly. Just like earthquakes and tsunamis; no government can ignore the damage from the nature disaster and continue with its long term plans, such as development in military technologies. Various actions must be taken to address the issues, that threaten the living conditions of its citizens, immedately. After all, addressing the current issue does not contradict with the main fuction of a government, that is to improve the living conditions of its citizens in all time.
To sum up, it would be unreasonable to take the statement to both extreme since to benefit a country, decisions and plans must be made considering the furture and current condition. A government should make apporpriate amount of attention to the current and future based on specific conditions instead of a general idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species 54
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 66
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 521, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... improtance of solving furture issues is , if not the same, greater than just dea...
^^
Line 1, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing furture issues is , if not the same, greater than just dealing with the probl...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...blem that a government is facing now. As I mentioned in the last paragraph, si...
^^
Line 2, column 1243, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
... fail to bring its citizens a long-term benefits. So from the standpoint of the duty of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more competitive are hardly imaginable. Admittedly, there are circumstances unde...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, well, after all, for example, i think, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 95.0 58.6224719101 162% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3115.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11494252874 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95750426828 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454844006568 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 970.2 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1111093922 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.791666667 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166311851479 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587963233753 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996583312649 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105114962021 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122832289124 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.