Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The author of the statement claim that Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. While some may argue that this statement holds all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples to support their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
The government should focus on current issues and use their resources to curb them. For example, issues like poverty, education, malnutrition, etcetera should be addressed first instead of putting more focus on long term planning. If these issues are not addressed now then they will create a severe problem in the near future.
However, we should not also ignore future problems because their effect could be more dangerous than the current problem. Focusing on anticipated issues and problems created due to global warming or any natural calamities is equally important as they can create an immense problem for a country who already has a lot of problems.
Now the question is who should or should not try to solve the future problem. The asnwer is, it depends on the current circumstance of a country. Because if a country is facing a lot of problems, then how can they focus on solving future problems, for example, Pakistan, which is on the edge of an economic crisis, if it starts focusing on how they can solve the future problem then their economy will soon crumble and the country has to face severe consequences. So, it is better for them to focus on the immediate problem rather than focusing on the future problem.
In a nutshell, it is necessary that a country focuses on anticipated problems of the future but it is very much important to look into present problems first because if present problems are overlooked, then they would harbinger bigger future chaos and problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- Technology 75
- Formal education at every society has certain responsibility to rear students in a right way in order to become appropriate members of society. 58
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 66
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the 59
- the students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry who already has a lot of problems. Now the question is who should or should...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er bigger future chaos and problems.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00309597523 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6043206741 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486068111455 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.5633274756 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483768863775 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198541071524 0.0831039109588 239% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.231424496228 0.0758088955206 305% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263962386013 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900782708917 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.