Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear
Government funding is the most important financial support for most of the research projects in the world, and these research projects are providing continuous innovations to our world. However, for research in any field, there must be a clear consequence that can be predicted before it starts.
From the government side, it is their necessary to make sure the research is controllable before they grant the fundings. The government has the responsibility to protect the citizens and make sure the society is stable, thus, any research that has unclear consequences should be forced to abort or should not be funded, since the consequence might be harmful to the citizens or the society. For instance, the if there is no theory support that the production of a substance is stable and no toxic gas could generate, the production shouldn’t be funded since the consequence is controversial to the government’s responsibility. For other research, if there is no theory foundations suggest that the research can be controlled, these research should not be funded.
On the other hand, government fundings to the scientific research is part of the government finance, which the finance is limited and need to be distributed wisely to the society. If the consequence of a research cannot be identified, the funding might be wasted, thus, before the government funding any research projects, it is necessary to examine its possible output. The massive fundings to the research that has no clear consequences can lead to the possible unbalance of government finance usage, which might further occupies the finance portion of other urgent need fields such as public health or education.
However, some people may argues that government’s actions can be considered as a violation of academic freedom, researchers should have all the rights to research freely, and the open research environment can significantly promote the innovations. It is widely admitted that all government should preserve academic freedom and boost the innovations, however, the freedom of research should be bound by ethics and humanity. Any research that can lead to the consequences that is no-ethic or against humanity should not be commenced. And the government is the only party that has the power to terminate such research activities. Thus, it is necessary for the government to examine whether there is theory basis that can prove there is no non-ethic and anti-humanity consequences from the research before they grant any kind of permissions or fundings.
In conclusion, the government should not fund any research projects that has no clear consequences since it might result to multiple issues, which eventually harmful to the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | georgez | 58 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33874709977 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03803654953 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403712296984 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9623709662 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.4 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7333333333 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449437509673 0.243740707755 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188837209009 0.0831039109588 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658624472593 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292194321979 0.150359130593 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413359389795 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.