Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Should Governments offer a free university education for the students who has been admitted to auniversity but cannot afford the tution? Education is the backbone of a nation and the educated and talented people drives the country into prosper. I strongly agree that Government should provide funding for those students who has merit but not financially solvent enough to afford the university tuition expenses in order to preserve talent and ensure basic human right.

Consider a situation where a future scientist who will invent the time machine, or a physician who will cure cancer one day, has to quit university education due to financial problem. As a result, the world will be deprived from time machine or cancer cure due to this issue. In these casers, Government should take responsibility to nurture the talents in order to flourish the nation. Money should not become a barrier for those who are asset of the nation. So, government should fund the students so that the society does not lose potential outputs.

Furthermore, it should be taken in mind that education is a fundamental right for human being. From antient history, governments are formed to preserve human rights and help those who can not help themselve. It is a basic responsilibility of government to provide basic needs to human being. So, government should provide support for the students for ensuring that they do not lose one of their basic rights.

Many people might think that governments should spend their money on more helpless people such as homeless people rather than spending it on education of an individual. I concede that there are more needy people than the students, however, these students are actually the gateway to solve those big problems eventually. For instance, in futute, one student may be able to extract a solution of hunger problem or homeless problem permanently with the research help from universities. These advantages on funding the students actually overrule those contradicts.

In sum, students and education are future of the country. If a nation wants to proper and shine, there are no alternatives than focusing on education and talented people. So, to encourage and nourish talent, government should provide support for the students who have capability to entoll in an university.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-30 Sumaiya Mila 50 view
2019-12-03 Moustafa Noufale 66 view
2019-12-03 Moustafa Noufale 66 view
2019-12-03 Moustafa Noufale 66 view
2019-11-09 Dhruv_gre 54 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Nafisa Ali Anika :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...y should not become a barrier for those who are asset of the nation. So, government sho...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...udents who have capability to entoll in an university.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, as to, for instance, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17914438503 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75802754671 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1876322776 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.947368421 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273844333639 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954429495186 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10186753736 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170116132306 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999165628054 0.0667264976115 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.