Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Education whether it be university or school level, plays an important role in determining the future of a individual. Having good education can improve a person's credentials and increase the good prospects. Hence the government funding of education can be advantageous. However if the government finances every student who can't afford the education, it could have the detrimental effect ; for instance the funding of other sectors could be jeopardized, the education sector could become precariously contingent on government. Because of such inexorable outcomes, i disagree with the claim.
The first argument opposing the claim is that does the funding the education of every student have beneficial effects? One way to think of it is that people are the future of the nation and education enhances the individual's ability. In that way, funding the education of the selected students can help improve the nation. But one should also consider cases like Bill Gates and Dhirubhai Ambani. These people did not receive any university education then also they are among the richest people in the world. On the other hand there are a profusion of people in the world who despite having a good college degree are unemployed. Such instances show that free university education may or may not have an impact on the student's career.
The second argument is based on princepled nature of the government. The offering of free university education need prodigious amount of funds. If the government allots such large sum of money to a particular sector ,education, by comprising other significant sector then it wouldn't be just. This could be even be considered as a state sponsored theft. Moreover such dependence can have adverse effects in the future. Take for example, if there are sudden economical crises in the country, then such funding of education would be rescinded and then education sector would have to suffer the repercussions.
However one can also argue that for the indigent students who can't afford education , the free university education will be a boon. Such individuals will then not have to worry about issues like -student loans; tuition fees- they can fully concentrate on their education. These students will then have better prospects and can act as a catalyst in upward mobility. However even nowadays there exists many scholarship programs that sponsor such individual.
After considering various sides to the argument, one can conclude that government funding of education can have both propitious and unpropitious outcomes. As a whole the merits of education funding are at best ambiguous in nature, whereas the demerits are substantial and can have far reaching implication. Hence i mostly disagree on the claim and believe that governments should not offer a free university education to every student.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
2023-10-27 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 83 | view |
2023-08-24 | Afolakemi | 66 | view |
2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 83 | view |
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 75
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 66
- "A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent. Another study, however 80
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 72
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has 60
Comments
Introduction- great, in point
Introduction- great,
in point 1- good, but some readers might think that ambani and bill gates are exceptional cases,also the became successful through business skills and not academics
also in place of "After considering various sides to the argument" I think
After considering both sides to the argument" would sound better
everything else is great
good use of vocab, how do you even do that :)
benjamin frankli- d scientist
benjamin frankli- d scientist was also nt educated; mark zuckerberg left his uni...... there are soo many such cases nowadayz.....
1st i quickly write the essay in normal language....then when m reviewing i change the words
thank you 4 d review
benjamin frankli- d scientist
benjamin frankli- d scientist was also nt educated; mark zuckerberg left his uni...... there are soo many such cases nowadayz.....
thank you 4 d review
Sentence: The second argument is based on princepled nature of the government.
Error: princepled Suggestion: principled
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 6
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 452 350
No. of Characters: 2335 1500
No. of Different Words: 214 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.611 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.166 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.753 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 178 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 135 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 101 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 73 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.08 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.794 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.68 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.482 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5