The prompt urges that scientific research and development should have few, if any restrictions placed on them by government. I mostly disagree with this claim and will elaborate on the necessary points to defend my stance.
To begin with, many restrictions have been placed on labs conducting research because of inhumane practices that have occurred in the past. These rules have been placed to protect research subjects from apparent harm that could potentially occur. A study from Stanford University in 2020 showed that as many as thirty percent of participants in studies that took place fifty years ago ended up with conditions that lasted for the rest of their lives. As a result, laws and regulations were put in place to prevent human subjects from incurring injuries or illnesses from being a part of the studies.
In addition, aside from preventing inhumane practices on humans, other preventative measures have been taken to keep humans safe. Most research on potentially toxic or carcinogenic chemicals are being tested on laboratory rats and mice before they are tested on humans. For example, artificial sweeteners were tested on these animals before any human research was conducted. When given in recommended dose quantities, these non-nutritive sweeteners have been shown to have no negative side effects on humans.
On the other hand, in contrast to my position, if the government were to place less rules on testing performance enhancing drugs on humans, we would know how to treat the conditions that arise from the athletes who abuse these compounds. We may be able to save lives if the authorities would allow this type of research and development to occur. However, we would not this research to encourage more individuals to participate in taking performance enhancing drugs if we learn that some are not as dangerous as we thought. Thus, it is imperative that the current restrictions on research in the areas stand.
Nevertheless, although it is true that research on drugs that enhance our performance in sport may offer some insight on how to treat any ill side effects that may come out of using them, for the reasons that I have explained it is paramount that the current rules and regulations stay in place.
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 58
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 50
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 50
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 58
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live then Middlesburg the home of SuperCorp s current headquarters Moreover Middle 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun rules is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...sition, if the government were to place less rules on testing performance enhancing ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in addition, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10298102981 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7969632908 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533875338753 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8217002806 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 5.21951772744 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15786904454 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603995991563 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592593748726 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10177417309 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060056393561 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun rules is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...sition, if the government were to place less rules on testing performance enhancing ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in addition, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10298102981 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7969632908 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533875338753 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8217002806 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 5.21951772744 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15786904454 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603995991563 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592593748726 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10177417309 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060056393561 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.