Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
The author of the statement claims that the governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. Many of us argue that the statement will hold all the time and others will counter this by providing an example for the same. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and provide sound reasoning for the same.
Research and development is the necessity of the country to survive. In recent years, humans have achieved a lot in the field of research and development and there is high competition among the countries not only that are developed but also in the developing countries. The Government is putting a good amount of their GDP in these programs and the reason being nobody wants to lack in this field and is also a matter of prestige for them.
If a country has dominance in scientific research and development then it will be automatically dominant the whole world, for example, the world has only one superpower that is the USA, because they have achieved a lot through their scientific and research work and no country can withstand with them. And this will also bring prosperity in society.
Another reason for a country to encouraging these work is to increase its influence in the region, for example, India and China want to increase their influence in the Asia region, Brazil and Argentina in the South America Continent and Saudi Arab and Iran in middle east and all these can be only possible if the countries are having good resources and are good in the field of research and development.
But due to all the above reasons, countries are now starting harming their biodiversity and wilderness areas and this could lead us to a severe problem in the coming future. Many of the species were extinct from the earth because of the side-effect of these work and many are declared as endangered species. The other side effect of this is global warming or climate change and we are now facing the problem because of this.
In nutshell, we can say scientific research and development are good for the country to increase their influence in the region and to dominate the world, but this does not mean that in the name of development and research we harm our biodiversity and nature. We should carry out development and research work without harming the biodiversity and wilderness areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 88
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 66
- the students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 58
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...e extinct from the earth because of the side-effect of these work and many are declared as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...now facing the problem because of this. In nutshell, we can say scientific resea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85185185185 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67470895191 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454320987654 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.5562692191 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.357142857 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203829794328 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926349928535 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194214288471 0.0758088955206 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105148463483 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912015849971 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.