Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Statement about the role government should play in R&Dis an important topic of every country, as it affect many of the ordinary citizens. However, too much restriction can have negative effects on the development and specific examples are necessary in order to find the line of government influence.
Should scientific research and development be untrammeleled by the governments´ legislation? The response on this question appears to be very subjective and moreover, can change according to specific circumstances, under which the question is analysed. First of all, research and developmnet can be highly beneficial and freedom in this area can be highly appreciated by the researchers and can benefit the humanity afterwards. In case of developed nations, research and development can be considered as the main driver of economic development of the country and therefore, the economic wellbeing of its citizens. For example, countries of Western Europe need inventions in industrial areas in order to be able to generate GHP growth in zears to come. There are not any more nations, which they migh „catch up“ and adopt their technology. Because their technology is in many cases superior. Hinder research and development by government legislative, therefore, would have detrimental consequencies on each and every citizen well being and future emplozement of each citizen.
However, as far as research and development play such an important role in our society, even if in many cases we do not see their effect dirrectly, motivation of this sector also needs to be taken into account. For example, the main motivation of research is to find a new laws of social world or nature, however, the ways of how the knowledge is generated can forget the moral principles, which need to be considered. In case of Stanford prison experiment, even if the findings have such a great importance, affected its participants in very negative ways and left many of them with hauting traumas for the rest of their lives. Every researcher should consider moral principles of each experiment or each research, however, they are tempted to overcome them. Because of this reason, government should act as guard of such principles to not allow experiments and actions which could put human wellbeing and health in stake.
Development can be dangerous in very same way. Private companies are profit seeking and their development departments work under this condition and with this motivation. Knowledge generated in the private company can be beneficial for the working condition of the employees, and improve their working condition by introducing heavy machinery or computers to their lives. However, without government restrictions, companies could easily develop their product which could subsequently have detrimental effect on whole society. As an example, gun companies may well have their R&D departments, however, what exactly they trying to develop should be controled by the government, which principal motivation is well being of its citizens.
Answer the statement is nota simple task. Research and development departments on universities, think tanks, or private companies should have their liberty in order to develop new technology and generate knowledge which benefits our societies as a whole. However, without government restrictions, the results might be insidious, as far as the motivation of these departments is not the well being if each and every ordinary citizen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. 55
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 69
- The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students. We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well-rounded and charitable members of society. The proposed graduation requ 69
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 66
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 806, Rule ID: EN_QUOTES[4]
Message: Possibly wrong smart opening quote: '“'.
Suggestion: “
...e not any more nations, which they migh „catch up' and adopt their technolog...
^
Line 5, column 850, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ch up' and adopt their technology. Because their technology is in many cases super...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'law'?
Suggestion: law
...motivation of research is to find a new laws of social world or nature, however, the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, first of all, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 12.9106741573 263% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2962.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 542.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46494464945 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04444201741 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453874538745 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 918.0 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7501511837 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.782608696 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5652173913 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129799078529 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483487836779 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636357667414 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898924102485 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355250867776 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.