The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries

Essay topics:

The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries

<p class="p1">This topic argues that the judgement of a life of a person would be determined only by the descendant, not by people of same ages. In a point, I partially agree with the statement the greatness of people might be decided uniquely by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. However, history in various field such as science and technology shows counterexamples to oppose it so I thought that each contemporaries can gauge the tremendous work of a personal. Therefore, the following essay will discuss extend of contents which need to be described for fully rich argument.</p><p class="p2"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br></p><p class="p1">Admittedly, speaking of the history of South Korea, where the hierarchical structure of politics are wide-spreading, objecting to the king of the Jo-Sun dynasty was definitely dangerous behavior in their period. Not only south Korea, but also most countries around the world have several histories of dictatorship or repressive society. Even in the modern society, some countries such as democratic of Korea still insist the autocracy with the president Kim as center. When the authority of the president are strong, contemporaries can hardly criticize the foundation of the nation such as organization of politic or government. Therefore, at that time, it was hard to write or state about the history of greatness of people. However, the period have been passed, the most state in the world adopt the democracy and it allows people to critic or admire the greatness of people from now on. The rest of essay will discuss the details of the trend of figuring out the excellent of the individuals.</p><p class="p2"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br></p><p class="p1"><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp; </span>First, people leading the state-of-the-art sometimes revered as the great man even though they as ever alive. For example, Bill gates, who found the one of the huge company, Microsoft, is regarded as the greatest man because of not only the assets of him, but also donation and consideration of the future of nature and leadership which realize the usability of the future devices by using the newest technologies of his company. For another example, the Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook esteemed by the copious of leader in start-up firm because of the trials for giving opportunities for them.</p><p class="p2"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br></p><p class="p1"><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp; </span>Second, speaking of the judgement of contemporaries for a people, there is no reason to speak about the case what has been recorded in my history. In the history of science and technologies, the case of both greatest man recent period are not such a great incident. Newton or Edison, the name as a scientist and engineer, could be found even in the textbook of the middle-school. Thus, we have experienced and acknowledge already the copious of example what we have through the class of history or news in the way of living our daily life.</p><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">

</span><p class="p2"><span class="Apple-converted-space" style="font-size: 1.1em;">&nbsp; </span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">In conclusion, although there was some nations which halt and block the critics of the huge individuals at the periods with dictator or who have powerful authority in their time, we observed and agreed lots of counterexamples opposing this throughout the history of different fields. In addition, the judgement of the individuals is recently allowed because of the advent of democracy and the developement of quickly developement of the technologies. THe greatness of individuals are no longer things only decided by those who live after them, but also by their contemporaries.</span></p>

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 JENIRSHAH 50 view
2020-01-18 JENIRSHAH 50 view
2020-01-08 stevewang1007 58 view
2019-12-06 chapagain08 58 view
2019-12-05 Dipper 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user yswang :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, speaking of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3476.0 2235.4752809 155% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10896309315 5.05705443957 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 6.42283960787 2.79657885939 230% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502636203866 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 1015.2 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 165.697769644 60.3974514979 274% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.470588235 118.986275619 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4705882353 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163587049241 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921232190562 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144040230281 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159766509607 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299231218579 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 14.1392134831 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.06 48.8420337079 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.75 12.1639044944 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.