The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people hold the view that human intellect will always be superior to machines as machines are created by humans, while other people are worried about the threat machines pose to human beings because of the improvement of machine intelligence. From my point of view, I fully agree with the former opinion, as machines are created and also can be controlled by humans.
Admittedly, machines are getting more intelligent in past several decades, especially after the new theory of machine learning is introduced. For example, Deep Mind, a subsidiary of Google, invented a deep learning system called Alpha Go, which has the ability to learn how to play the game of go through delving the existing go games. After practicing for several months in, Alpha Go defeated the world’s most famous go player in a five-round go contest this year, and people were shocked by the “thinking” ability of the system which is deployed in a computer. Thus, many people think that machines may dominate the world over humans someday.
However, while it is true that machines like computers are evolving into more intelligent ones, people shall not forget that the softwares and hardwares of these machines are developed by humans. As humans have the ability to create these machines, they can also destroy machines. For example, to limit the evolution of machines, engineers can set some software switches in advance and trigger them in case machines evolve too fast and have the possibility to surpass human intellect. Thus, humans can not only reap the benefits of machines but also control the evolution of machines.
In addition, In order to control the machine intelligence, except the software switches, more detailed restrictions should be enacted to articulate the boundary of developing machines. If there’re no specific laws regulating the advancement of machines, tech genius may create a machine monster which is superior to humans. If this is the case, such a monster is beyond human control and may conduct undesired behaviours to disrupt human civilisation. On the contrary, With the precise definitions of how to develop machines, tech companies can follow these definitions to create machines and prevent them from evolving into creatures which exceed human beings in intelligence.
In sum, as long as humans impose specific regulations on the advancement of machines and follow such regulations strictly, the threat machines will pose to humans can be properly controlled and human mind will always be superior to machines.
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the pas 62
- The following appeared as part of a campaign to sell advertising time on a local radio station to local businesses:"The Cumquat Café began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over 69
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 66
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 62
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 66
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'it is true', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272138228942 0.240241500013 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.164146868251 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.07343412527 0.0880659088768 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0453563714903 0.0497285424764 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0129589632829 0.0444667217837 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.131749460043 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0388768898488 0.0406280797675 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85842432473 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0323974082073 0.030933414821 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0885529157667 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0302375809935 0.0249443105267 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0129589632829 0.0148568991511 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2553.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 407.0 452.878318584 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27272727273 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.420147420147 0.366273622748 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.326781326781 0.280924506359 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.233415233415 0.200843997647 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135135135135 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85842432473 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4914004914 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 53.7662591982 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 27.1333333333 23.380412469 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2291344016 59.4972553346 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.2 141.124799967 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1333333333 23.380412469 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.674092028746 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 59.8114660115 51.4728631049 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.99029126214 1.64882698954 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496322282062 0.391690518653 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.157534847663 0.123202303941 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0744639872105 0.077325440228 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.636480672434 0.547984918172 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158534629675 0.149214159877 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22810046995 0.161403998019 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775670216966 0.0892212321368 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.369316907951 0.385218514788 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0701943256156 0.0692045440612 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347517239799 0.275328986314 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303599928155 0.0653680567796 46% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.