The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people hold the view that human intellect will always be superior to machines as machines are created by humans, while other people are worried about the threat machines pose to human beings because of the improvement of machine intelligence. From my point of view, I fully agree with the former opinion, as machines are created and also can be controlled by humans.
Admittedly, machines are getting more intelligent in past several decades, especially after the new theory of machine learning is introduced. For example, Deep Mind, a subsidiary of Google, invented a deep learning system called Alpha Go, which has the ability to learn how to play the game of go through delving the existing go games. After practicing for several months in go games, Alpha Go defeated the world’s most famous go player in a five-round go contest this year, and people were shocked by the “thinking” ability of the system which is deployed in a computer. Thus, many people think that machines may dominate the world over humans someday.
However, while it is true that machines like computers are evolving into more intelligent ones, people shall not forget that the softwares and hardwares of these machines are developed by humans. As humans have the ability to create these machines, they can also destroy machines. For example, to limit the evolution of machines, engineers can set some software switches in advance and trigger them in case machines evolve too fast and have the possibility to surpass human intellect. Thus, humans can not only reap the benefits of machines but also control the evolution of machines.
In addition, one of the fatal weaknesses of a machine is its inability to deal with unexpected situations. The softwares a machine relies on are pre-loaded and can not be changed if there’s no update to the machine. Therefore, machines can only process predefined situations, such as calculating and other repeated work. If machines are assigned with a new task, they don’t have the ability to execute the task. On the contrary, when encountering a new situation, the critical and creative thinking ability in human minds enables people to carry out a tough task which never happened before.
In sum, although machines now triumph people in areas that require mass calculation ability, people are still superior to machines, as they can not only control the evolution of machines, but also have the thinking ability to handle emergency situations.
- The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:"This past winter, 200 students from Waymarsh State College traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programs. The oth 77
- tpo 4 3
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 70
- The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods:"Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color 80
- TPO-17:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as', 'it is true', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27408993576 0.240241500013 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.156316916488 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0749464668094 0.0880659088768 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.051391862955 0.0497285424764 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.017130620985 0.0444667217837 39% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128479657388 0.12292977631 105% => OK
Participles: 0.03426124197 0.0406280797675 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78712392028 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0278372591006 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.00214132762313 0.0016655270985 129% => OK
Determiners: 0.0899357601713 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0214132762313 0.0249443105267 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0128479657388 0.0148568991511 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2494.0 2732.02544248 91% => OK
No of words: 405.0 452.878318584 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.15802469136 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395061728395 0.366273622748 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320987654321 0.280924506359 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227160493827 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123456790123 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78712392028 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523456790123 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 58.6383750444 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 25.3125 23.380412469 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4371768347 59.4972553346 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.875 141.124799967 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 23.380412469 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9375 0.674092028746 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 57.4112654321 51.4728631049 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.94285714286 1.64882698954 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471762142252 0.391690518653 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143957272362 0.123202303941 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0898448085823 0.077325440228 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.601767299163 0.547984918172 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182406695909 0.149214159877 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205829232329 0.161403998019 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715548642539 0.0892212321368 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.341014774671 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0491657550151 0.0692045440612 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323076185221 0.275328986314 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379778517862 0.0653680567796 58% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.