The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
This topic raises controversial issue of whether the human mind can always be superior than machines or not. Surely, recent development of artificial intelligence and technology amaze us with mechanical performance. However, there are certain areas that machines can never reach while humans can. Thus, I generally agree with the statement that the human minds will always be superior to machines in terms of creativity and imagination and would claim that machines are only superior to humans in providing convenience for humans to work.
Admittedly, machines enhance our lives and their certain abilities are superior to those of humans in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Take BioArt as an example. BioArt employs fine arts with molecular biology and technology. For instance, Eduardo Kac used green fluorescent protein to produce his famous piece, “GFP Bunny.” Only with the help of advanced technology, he could create this art piece. Likewise, technology has already been permeated into many fields, including arts.
However, in terms of creation and imagination, we should not overlook the power of human minds. While GFP Bunny is a fruit of advanced technology, it could have not been created without Kac’s creativity and imagination. In Kac’s work, the machines or laboratory tools only helped Kac to complete his creation conveniently and accurately. While the fluorescent machine could have placed the proteins on a desired spot more accurately than any human could, the machine would have not been able to authentically create any art piece. This example illustrates that human minds are superior to machines since humans can create and imagine. Machines can only assist humans to realize their creativity.
Not only fine arts but also ideas are unique products of human minds. Our cultures have evolved from ancient societies to modern societies by testing and adopting different ideas that humans made. Plato’s “Republic” stirred people to establish democracy and Karl Marx’ ideas tested communism on multiple nations. Though not all of these ideas were productive or beneficial, they paved the new ground for humans to test and practice for enhanced life standards. Sometimes, some of those groundbreaking ideas brought us great benefits and allowed human race to flourish. Yet, no machines can generate a groundbreaking idea, which can open a new paradigm for humans.
In conclusion, I admit that machines can excel humans in terms of accuracy and efficiency. However, in terms of creativity and producing groundbreaking ideas, machines cannot compete human minds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | DH123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | arjun2112 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | ajay yadav | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Nithin Narla | 50 | view |
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds. 62
- the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 66
- Scandals are useful because they direct our attention on problem in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 66
- When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatly from Delany s services last year those who use 88
- Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts. Reason: politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgement and perspective than do members of the general public. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...r the human mind can always be superior than machines or not. Surely, recent develop...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, look, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53598014888 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92958910934 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553349875931 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9467103179 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5217391304 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91304347826 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458872184315 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140828256807 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13923688051 0.0758088955206 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275483700197 0.150359130593 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146896681424 0.0667264976115 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.