The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The human mind is creator of every new developments and technologies in today’s era; it’s the contribution of those millions and billons of neurons that made our lives easy. It is just like God who created Man, it is our brain and its intelligence that created something which makes our daily works easy and handy. The human brain is something that is more treasured and price possessed than any hundreds of giant machines but hypocritically we value machines and instruments more than any labour work. But in the end, agreeing to the above statement, it is the mind that remains superior to all those high-tech machines. I will illustrate two examples in accordance to the above fact.
First, a simple humble calculator which is a machine that has made our calculative lives easy and approachable. It does squaring and multiplications of huge numbers in an iota of time. It allows us to finish huge calculations and accounting in no time but if our brains were preposterous and dimwit as to what numbers to punch in the calculator, our lives would have been hard even with a mighty calculator’s presence. Even if the workers are intelligent and genius they need wise and knowledgeable master to guide their intelligence in right direction.
Second, the ferocious guns and bullets used in war-zone have much value then the lives of the soldiers who operate them. But, these guns and mighty weapons are of no use if there is no person to operate them. They will rust to waste if they are polished and used properly with cautious. These are after all machines, they tend to fail their function and they cannot by any means be useful for a years but a mighty brain it can always work no matter what the situation is.
We value these machines more the minds that created these, exorbitantly the government and people spend money buying machines but they think many times hiring a labour in a company. People can spend innumerable money to obtain the machines but they spend thrift amount of money on the salaries of labours. In today’s world we have forgotten the importance and use of our minds because our views are veiled under the impressive works of a machine. Nonetheless, it will always be the minds of the human that will stand superior to any high-end technology or machine, cause we created them not other way round.
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 59
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sendin 29
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 35
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East M 75
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a year' or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: a year; years
... they cannot by any means be useful for a years but a mighty brain it can always work n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, then, after all, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83622828784 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76494505476 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523573200993 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5857099731 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.647058824 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148818989554 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471074419035 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411180156441 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879709813941 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474810442268 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.