Issue Topic
Claim: Restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the food they serve.
Reason: This knowledge will help diners make healthy choices and reduce their risk of diet-related health problems.
Many restaurants state the main ingredients on their menu, but few display nutritional information about the food they serve. Not providing nutritional information to consumers has been acceptable until now. However, as people become more inspired to live a healthier lifestyle, it is unlikely that this will continue to be acceptable. Many are choosing to eat clean, opt into a dietary preference, and select restaurants who are explicit in how they prepare their food.
Eating clean is defined as consuming food that has not been extensively processed through a factory or loaded with additives in its preparation. Organic and wild-caught foods are consumed by people who strive to eat clean, and have recently begun to take over grocery stores. Existing grocery stores have expanded their specialty foods and organic section, while other grocers have been recently created to diminish the lack of clean items on the market such as Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, and Aldi. Those who strive to eat a healthy diet by shopping at organic grocery stores are the same individuals who would appreciate knowing what the nutritional information when dining at a restaurant. Therefore, it only makes sense to conform to the trend in popularity of supporting people’s initiatives to eat clean and provide them of the information they disserve to know.
Along with the rising trend in eating clean is the increased number of people who claim to be vegetarians, vegans, or choose other dietary preferences. Each person with such a preference and motivation to follow a restricted diet should be supported in doing so. For example, fried rice commonly found at Asian restaurants if often prepared using fish oil. Though its taste and other properties typically go unnoticed to the consumer, someone following a vegan diet would normally be unaware of this ingredient that they can’t consume. By restaurants providing explicit nutritional information allows the consumer with a dietary preference to eat there without having to worry, as opposed to avoiding a particular restaurant altogether.
Although provided nutritional information allows customers to know what exactly they’re eating, it may also deter them from going to a certain restaurant if they don’t like what they see. This may cause some restaurants to lose customers, but if the restaurant is smart they will clean up their recipes and update the nutritional information of the food they serve based on the desire of people to eat healthier. Earning their customers back will create a lasting connection that the restaurant should be proud to undertake.
The inadequacy of restaurants to be transparent about the information they display to consumers about the food they serve is quickly becoming unacceptable. With a growing population of people who yearn to eat clean, participate in dietary preferences, and know exactly what they’re eating, it only makes sense for restaurants to conform to this trend and provide nutritional information about the food they serve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-31 | Mateo Chen | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | David91 | 62 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | David Olatunji | 54 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | David Olatunji | 54 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | David Olatunji | 54 | view |
- Issue Topic Claim Restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the food they serve Reason This knowledge will help diners make healthy choices and reduce their risk of diet related health problems 92
- Advertising with Cable Communications Corp. is the most effective way to increase a company's profits. Recently, Adams Car Dealership began advertising with Cable Communications, and over a subsequent 30-day period, the dealership's sales rose 15% over sa 35
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2583.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38125 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95813893141 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0042126499 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.947368421 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2631578947 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2843879662 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1040278931 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754199228089 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197804207257 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764230974434 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.