It is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value.
The author claims that the artist endows persistent value in the society which cannot be done by critic. In my view, I basically agree with this idea. In general, critics, whose works largely depend on artists, cannot provide society with things of lasting value. I will show my analysis below.
To begin with, critics’ opinions toward the same art work can vary overtime, and therefore cannot produce a long lasting value. The criticism from critics is subjective, it is elicited from critics’ personal thought: including the way they perceive the world, their inclination, even their own bias, which vary among generations. To illustrate, Van Gogh, in his life time, his paintings did not fit the value of contemporary critics and did not appreciated by contemporary people and critics - as a result, only one art work was sold in his life time. After he died, however, critics values changed so that they are fascinated by his unique manner that depicts the flow of light. Finally, his paintings win the popularity and are still honored by people today.
Furthermore, the criticism merely an auxiliary work accompanied arts. Critics acts as a role that helps interprets the content of art work. That is, the main works of critics is that to utilize their skills to analyze the details and present their insights to the public. It is largely depends on the art works they focus on. This efforts are not original and cannot be a long lasting value. On the other hand, the things that artists create are rife of originality: the style of a painting, the gusto of a novels, the views of sculptures can be creative and thus passing through history.
However, although critics are lack of original values that can last through generation by itself, it can still have long lasting influences through history. First, critics can influence art works. Artists assimilate suggestions from critics then produce and consummate their works. Second, critics can bring new aspects and insights to the public. The same works can be appreciated in different aspects, and these new angles of artwork can be passed to future. In this way, the thought of critics can integrate into or accompany artists’ work thus perpetuate through history.
In sum, owning to the different role of artists and critics, to large extend, only artists can produce long-lasting values. Nevertheless, critics can indirectly influence artists and art work then their thought can pass through generations.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
- It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data 16
- In any realm of life whether academic social business or political the only way to succeed is to take a practical rather than an idealistic point of view Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival whereas idealistic views tend to be supersede by simpler more 83
- The chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history 58
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporary 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...ations. To illustrate, Van Gogh, in his life time, his paintings did not fit the value of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'appreciate'
Suggestion: appreciate
...lue of contemporary critics and did not appreciated by contemporary people and critics - as...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...sult, only one art work was sold in his life time. After he died, however, critics values...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...depends on the art works they focus on. This efforts are not original and cannot be ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a novel' or simply 'novels'?
Suggestion: a novel; novels
...: the style of a painting, the gusto of a novels, the views of sculptures can be creativ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, in general, as a result, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1157635468 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6230592762 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504926108374 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8394187893 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3043478261 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.652173913 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26086956522 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250694970063 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799522642289 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609866384748 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161220895792 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295041231727 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.