It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
A political leader is always concerned about the public, as they are the ones because of which he is currently governing the country.But many times, they withhold information from the public for their benefits. Since there are certain information which the public should be aware of, therefore, In my opinion, I partially disagree with the author’s statement and suggestions because of the following 2 reasons.
For instance, as we all know that china was performing certain operations and experitments on few victims by testing on them certain chemical reactions and their effects and benefits of it. Because of which it led to a pervasive pandemic in the country, Known as COVID-19. This was a certain type of virus which spread rapidly when people are in contact with one another. Since the population of China is the highest, this virus was spread among many people and which cost them their lives. If the political leaders governing the country would have informed the public early about the experiment, instead of withholding the information from the public, then the condition would have been much better.
Another example is of the United States of America, Recently the political leader, Donald Truimph, without asking the public opinions, passed a law that foreign country students who are currently pursuin their Masters studies online because of the COVID-19 outbreak, but are staying in America, have to leave the country and go to their respective country’s until the COVID-19 virus situation is stable. This led to a lot of controversies between the universities and the government as it would harm the life of the student studying. The political leader should have asked the public opinion before passing such laws.
However, there are certain informations which should not be released to the public until the task is over and successful. For example, the URI attack, done by the Indian armed forces on the Pakistan terrorists by entering their country by crossing the LOC. If this information was made available by the political leaders to the public then somehow this information may be leaked to Pakistan by his agents and would be difficult to complete the task. Therefore in certain situations it is necessary, even desirable to withhold information from the public.
Though there are certain cons of withholding the information from the public, the pros outweigh the cons. Therefore because of the above reasons I partially disagree with the authors statement.
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 33
- It is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 50
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...h he is currently governing the country.But many times, they withhold information f...
^^^
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ould be difficult to complete the task. Therefore in certain situations it is necessary, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the public, the pros outweigh the cons. Therefore because of the above reasons I partiall...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e reasons I partially disagree with the authors statement.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22139303483 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72013873247 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.1361317209 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.1875 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325224545566 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116252101157 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124958998979 0.0758088955206 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19899667141 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772889644929 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.