Before dwelling deep into the way how laws should be applied, one should first ask himself a few questions about the laws. What are laws? Why did the government framed laws? For whose well-being did laws were imposed? The simple answer to this question is that all pain staking efforts were to ensure the equality in the society. Along with equality, laws, in the form of constitution, guarantee an individual a right to freedom, justice and education as well. The most compelling reason behind framing laws was the inequality among the society. There was an urgent need to overcome such problems, which is why erudite from all across the world framed laws. Does it make any point to have a flexible law which can be molded according to situation, time or need. To me it does not.
First of all, a set of laws is imposed on all being, irrespective of the race, religion, sex or financial capability of an individual. But if laws were to be flexible, they would have been easily used in favor or against mundane people, by influenced people like politicians and bureaucrats. These aristocrats would have reformed them according to their need and demand. For instance, the supreme court of America found that some affluent people were using forged sports certificates to help their children get admitted to top schools. Once this scam was noticed by the court, they probed an inquiry and those who were found guilty were fined and incarcerated for months. Now consider the scenario if the laws would haven flexible? Those all elite class people would have bribed the judges to roam freely.
Secondly, it is human tendency to compare themselves with other humans. They not only compare in terms of richness but also in terms of the rules governing the affluent class people and themselves. Since any form of government is elected by both, common people and elite class people, it is the responsibility of the government to ensure that same rules are applicable on everyone. Otherwise, it will stir up the public opinion leading to chaos and protests.
So in my opinion, no one solely should have the authority to amend laws. Having said there might be some genuine cases where a reform is required for the benefit of all people. At such juncture, a committee should be framed to analyze the need and consequences of the amendment to laws. Laws were meant for the proper functioning of a government and society, so we should let them serve the purpose.
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 70
- 49. Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 58
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'frame'?
Suggestion: frame
.... What are laws? Why did the government framed laws? For whose well-being did laws wer...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'admitted topping'.
Suggestion: admitted topping
...certificates to help their children get admitted to top schools. Once this scam was noticed by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8432304038 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56451117694 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567695961995 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7510748403 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.56 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.84 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122685614538 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398350494679 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446589938372 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735287776073 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514939085168 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.